this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
621 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

17736 readers
1823 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (4 children)

To obtain a PhD, you need to contribute something original to your field of study, not just regurgitate what you've scraped from other studies.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 17 hours ago

Also a PhD is an expert in a hyper specific niche area of their specialty. Would I trust someone who has a PhD in astrophysicist with an expertise on black holes. When it comes to talking about black holes? Yes.

Would I trust that person to give me medical advice? Probably not. Would I trust them to help me show basic car maintenance? Maybe and only because they have experience with car maintenance not because of a PhD.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ceos are so obsessed with this and thinking it can replace doctors in diagnosing people too.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe not replace, but some flavour of AI is already pretty good at analyzing patterns on x-ray images and stuff like that which might be significant help to doctors in the future. Obviously not the glorified autocorrect Altman is running with hype-money, but actually useful neural network things (or whatever they really are, I'm not one building them).

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

Narrow models trained on a task specific data set tend to be very good at their specialization. So protien folding, or material sciences have benefitted from machine learning, but we shouldn't mistake that for being the same thing as chatGPT.

One of the bigger problems we have with AI at the moment (in my very inexpert opionion) is that they seem to be trying to throw LLMs at every problem and swearing that it'll achieve AGI soon.

Meanwhile Alpha Fold is more closely related to stable diffusion than it is to ChatGPT.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it spouts out enough nonsense something will be right eventually

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

GPT5 is gonna monkey a new hamlet? ITS GONNA BE THE BLURST OF TIMES?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 17 hours ago

ITS GONNA BE THE BLURST OF TIMES?

You stupid AI.

[–] ryo@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 day ago

I guess given enough hardware and environmental destruction everything is possible.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder whether any LLMs are any good at hypothesis generation

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

1000 monkeys with typewriters comes to mind

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

probably not, it will like scrape from sources that arnt even based on research, or research papers, if its allowed to use the internet it will probably process opinions too.