Not when the specific IP addresses of services are blocked on IPS level - which would be mandated by the state.
VPN/Tor, sure, but at that point the service itself can't confirm where the visitor is from, therefore Australian laws wouldn't apply.
Not when the specific IP addresses of services are blocked on IPS level - which would be mandated by the state.
VPN/Tor, sure, but at that point the service itself can't confirm where the visitor is from, therefore Australian laws wouldn't apply.
National level site blocking, suspension on any future operations, international courts... Corporations are much easier to persecute over borders than private persons.
Why do you think American companies, even ones with no legal presence in Europe, still went along with GDPR? Same principle applies here.
Sounds like you need to pick up a dictionary. Maybe even a thesaurus.
IIRC moving the instance won't be helpful - the issue is the servicing of minors, not where the service is. And while the server being in a different country might be a bit of a roadblock for legalities, the general consensus is, like with GDPR - if you make your service available in Australia you must comply with Australian laws, therefore need to make your instance unavailable to children.
Where the fuck did I say that? Fucking hell, the state of Lemmy at times...
I'm literally advocating for change here, BY FUCKING TELLING Y'ALL TO NOT BLAME THE FELLOW WORKER, but the actually wealthy.
The top 10% earners make approx. $120k a year. Which seems a lot, given there are people in India who make less than 1% of that in a year.
But that wealth disparage is NOTHING compared to the difference between said high earner (whose real income will be maybe 1/3 of what they make, after taxes, rent, etc.), and one of the 60k.
My point is still to blame the members of the 60k, not those who make $60k.
Holy shit is this instance full of idiots.
Who the fuck said anything about petit bourgeoisie? A high EARNER still has to work, dipshit. Still has to produce something to get paid. We're not talking about landlords here, or shitheads living off investments, but people like DOCTORS. Do you consider medical professionals "petit bourgeoisie" just because they earn more than the average?
And even high earners can be in the "gee I hope I can eat this week" category.
But please do skip my point about cost of living being important when it comes to wages, and fight a completely made up argument you put in my mouth because fictional BS is easier to fight than what I actually said.
You do realise that I'm NOT part of that 60k and I wasn't defending them, right?
Read the second part of the damn post ffs, where it equates high earners with the highest wealth people as if they're equally the issue.
The orange tainted cunt can't die soon or painfully enough. May he suffer long.
Meanwhile I'll be sipping a nice whisky here in "failing" Europe.
Even if the scale was aligned with absolute zero - like Kelvin - it would not be able to describe temperature changes in the multiples primarily because our FEEL of temperature is what matters here. And since humans live in the approx. temperature ranges of -40 to 80 (using an extended range to cover cases like the Arctic/Antarctic stations, or saunas), the best scale to use would be a Celsius scale shifted somewhat to make 0deg the most optimal neutral temperature - which is, in my opinion, 16 degrees Celsius.
You'd think so, but without specifying the scale... it could be anything. ANYTHING!
Yeah sure that's why major news sites "complied" with GDPR by blocking European visitors...