this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
800 points (99.1% liked)

World News

51321 readers
1400 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fewer than 60,000 people – 0.001% of the world’s population – control three times as much wealth as the entire bottom half of humanity, according to a report that argues global inequality has reached such extremes that urgent action has become essential.

The authoritative World Inequality Report 2026, based on data compiled by 200 researchers, also found that the top 10% of income-earners earn more than the other 90% combined, while the poorest half captures less than 10% of total global earnings.

Wealth – the value of people’s assets – was even more concentrated than income, or earnings from work and investments, the report found, with the richest 10% of the world’s population owning 75% of wealth and the bottom half just 2%.

In almost every region, the top 1% was wealthier than the bottom 90% combined, the report found, with wealth inequality increasing rapidly around the world.

“The result is a world in which a tiny minority commands unprecedented financial power, while billions remain excluded from even basic economic stability,” the authors, led by Ricardo Gómez-Carrera of the Paris School of Economics, wrote.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Those puny little ants outnumber us 100 to 1. And if they ever figure that out, there goes our way of life!

[–] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

But we've just been playing all summer.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago

what's wrong with a billionaire having $1B worth of yachts, while the rest of us are struggling to feed ourselves? what's wrong with that?? (/s)

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

we need to organize. seriously!

[–] M137@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No comments about the "accept all or reject all and subscribe" really says something about no one ever reading the article. And just to be clear, I'm in full agreement of how fucked this is. It just really stuck out to me. And I highly doubt everyone who commented used some extention, script or service to get past that, I feel pretty confident that almost none did. If most did at least one would have posted a link so everyone else could get the full article.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 88 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Guillotines are surprisingly cheap to build.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The implicit song here goes hard

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 49 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Most of the world is capitalist, and most of the world is poor.

[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists. (G. K. Chesterton)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

60,000 is way to many. They need to be able to fit on a giga yacht.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And then we make an artificial reef out of it

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

The coral all died.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago

Some pressing and stomping and they will nicely fit to any rusted sea tanker.

load more comments (2 replies)

It's gone from can't everyone just pay your fair share of taxes?

To can't we at least tax the rich?

How about just the 1%?

Ok..., how about just the 0.001%?

And then somehow conservatives leaders will convince a voter base to take to the streets with pitchforks and torches, claiming it's tyranny, then once they're elected, the leaders will still tax the fucking voter base.

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

This seems not conducive to the common wellbeing of humanity I think.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The fact is money is relative. $100k USD is a lot of money in New Guinea and is not going to buy as much in London. This is why it is perfectly acceptable for someone like Thiel to assemble a private army with his wealth while people starve because they haven’t worked the grind correctly like Musk, Thiel or the Mountbatten-Windsors have /s.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

You had me in the first half...

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

I feel like numbers at this point just are pointless. It's like, can we use vocabulary that actually describes the situation instead of updating this every time the decimal point shifts?

Describing it in terms of wealth is kind of dumb. It gives the idea that the systems that caused this (Imperialism, colonialism, capitalism) are the solution. Like, the global South just needs "investment". The numbers are this bad because of a century of western "investment" in its exploitation the global South.

There isn't a number attached to this that somehow fixes the problem when we reach it. This is about what essentially amounts to slavery and subjugation of the majority of this planet. The language of these news articles is so passive. Like it's describing the amount of stars in the galaxy.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remind me again how capitalism isn't the problem? lmao

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do you think in feudal times things were better?

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Well, I'll tell you one thing. The solution for some of the bad monarchies should be taking place today but for the bad people running majority of countries but nobody has the guts to pull one for the team.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

People might think that the extremity is a good thing as it will force change, which may be true, but realistically the world will be in for an extended period of conflict/war/suffering first and that period will probably last the rest of our lives.

Boomers hit that sweet spot. Now they get to check out as things are about to get real bad. Not that boomers everywhere in the world had it good. But a lot of them did.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

If you aren't straight, white or a man you are already suffering.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Boomers hit that sweet spot.

American boomers, maybe. The 60s/70s was real shit for most of the Third World.

Much of our modern Economic Anxiety driving MAGA and the reactionary insanity of our foreign policy is these same Boomers being forced to live in a world that isn't just the car dealerships in Detroit commanding the global economy.

For the 90s Kids, life outside the US hasn't been this good in a century or more. Whether you're in Bogota, Berlin, Beijing, or Bankok, it's a time of unprecedented plenty.

The fact that America isn't this shining city on a hill anymore is what Trumpsters find so galling.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the entire existence of humanity, class struggle still has yet to end.

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I started to feel that’s a mathematical issue, not an economic issue. Since the internet is a thing, a person’s influence and wealth can increase exponentially(benefiting from the networking effect aka power law), while the best tax law can do is still linear.

We need a tax law that grows exponentially. After certain points, it should collect almost 100% of the “controllable assets” (assets you can control, not necessarily owed).

But of course, we will never get it. People who have the will to climb the ladder tend to have less empathy for the masses, and they need to pay back to their stakeholders to help them get on top. It’s another paradox we need to deal with.

TBH the only thing that can fix humanity is extraterrestrial life lol.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I would call it systemic, in fact I'd argue it's the central flaw of capitalism (but one that imo can be mostly fixed with heavy regulation and taxes scaling to near 100% as you say).

When wealth = power, those with wealth will always attract even more wealth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

load more comments
view more: next ›