davel

joined 2 years ago
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Worse for whom?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

Imagine being so communist and/or anti-American that you can’t criticize a fascist capitalist state over a liberal capitalist state.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago (8 children)

that’s contradicted by the fact that it’s mostly Ukrainians themselves fighting, even if armed by allies.

Which Ukrainians?

  • The oligarchs running the state?
  • The Banderite fascists?
  • The eastern & southern Ukrainians, who, after the Maidan coup, declared independence from an unelected government, and were subsequently terrorized by the Banderites for nearly a decade, with tacit and overt support from the Ukrainian and US governments?
  • The western Ukrainians who want the war to end?
  • The men being kidnapped off the streets and pushed to the front lines against their will?

 
Previously: If not for the US/NATO, this war wouldn’t have happened in the first place.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

Previously:

Honest question from a non-communist, based on your reply here. Does one need to support Putin to be a Marxist?

In a word, no. In a few more words, support for Russia (not Putin, as historical materialists don’t subscribe to great man theory) is only a partial, temporary, tactical one, in the context of imperialist liberation. Russia is still a capitalist state, though, so it’s a two stage strategy: first liberate colonized bourgeois states from colonizer states, and second revolution within those liberated bourgeois states.

Russia is an interesting case: it has already liberated itself from the post-Soviet “shock therapy” neocolonizers. This occurred during Putin’s administration, which is why he is especially hated by the US. So now the support for Russia is in the context of keeping the colonizers from recolonizing it, and supporting Russia to the extent that it helps other states liberate themselves. But Russia isn’t trying to “liberate” Ukraine, at least not all of Ukraine. It’s trying to resolve the genocidal attacks on the people of the Donbas, and it’s trying to resolve the imperialist military expansion at its border.

Previously:

Previously:

NATO expansion:

 
NATO in general:

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Is this the same NYT that published Screams without Words?

Had you engaged with the materials I provided, you wouldn’t be asking me to refute things that those materials already refute.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The fact remains that China didn’t withhold its commitments while many of the “always the same map” countries did. The very same countries that falsely accused China of geocoding Muslims.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Again, what’s your point? China is not among the countries that suspended funding after al Aqsa Flood.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 33 points 5 days ago (16 children)

Ask a German to pronounce “squirrel.”

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 days ago (5 children)

ZOMG China has prisons?!

view more: ‹ prev next ›