AcidiclyBasicGlitch

joined 5 months ago
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Absolutely devastated. I'm sorry your mom got angry with you when you asked her. I don't know her, so I don't say this to try and excuse her behavior, but a lot of times people react in defensive and inappropriate ways when they hear something that's truly scary and they don't want to allow themselves to even think about it. Or it could be she worries about how it reflects on her.

I had a similar relationship with my mom when I was younger, and when I told her stuff like that, she usually also got mad at me and didn't believe me/thought I was being dramatic. I didn't realize it at the time, but she was a big part of why I ever felt that way to begin with.

I hope you can remember your own value isn't implicitly tied to her (or anyone's) opinion of you, and that your feelings are always valid. Sometimes it can be hard to really sort through and process your feelings and emotions, especially when the person that's supposed to teach you how to do that, isn't really setting the best example.

I find it helpful to just take some time (maybe 10 mins) every day or a few times a week, and just write in a notepad all your feelings. Just let them come forward without censoring yourself or worrying about how it sounds. You don't have to go back and read it, and it doesn't have to make sense. You can delete it as soon as you're done and it's just a way to let it out and label your emotions when you can't verbally express how you feel.

If you find yourself activated or really upset after writing (or anytime) and you're willing to give it a try, there are a lot of somatic breathing and stretching videos that can help calm your nervous system down when you're in an activated state.

https://youtu.be/5XntUJOVZfc

It can feel kinda silly and woo woo at first, but it can be pretty surprisingly helpful.

I used to default to relying on the top comments, but especially with platforms like Reddit having shills and other types of conversation dominating trolls, I try to scroll through the comments. It's a lot easier to do on Lemmy.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I used to think I knew my parents pretty well, but the older I've gotten, I've realized you can't really completely know anybody more than what they want you to know. If that makes sense? With my dad at least, he can have his moments of wow what an asshole (and I can too). But I also know that no matter what, even if he's pissed off about something, he can take a breather, set the anger aside and try to do whatever he can to help out if I need him to be there for me. He's always been like that and it really means a lot to me. Definitely more than all the things he could have and probably should have done differently at various points.

I know he is also kind of blinded by how he sees me as "his daughter," and he doesn't always seem to give my opinion the same level of respect he does my brother or even my husband. Like sometimes if he has a question about something, he'll automatically default to my husband even if my husband doesn't know anything about what he's asking. Or like if we disagree about something political he just kind of tunes out what I'm saying or gets really defensive if I disagree with him. But then my brother can tell him the exact same thing and he just kind of takes it in as new information or a different opinion to consider. I know it would probably hurt his feelings (and just lead to another argument) if I pointed that out, so I usually just don't. I just kind of joke about it with other people, and roll my eyes when it happens, but that also means that implicitly he doesn't really know me as well as he might believe he does.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Don't flush gloves down the toilet." I think I might still have a picture I took of the sign somewhere.

Yep, rubber gloves specifically

 

New Orleans unsolved is a podcast that began in 2020 examining the unsolved murder of a young boy, Eddie Wells, in the Bywater neighborhood of New Orleans during the 1980s. Eddie's life was full of hardships, and when his body was pulled from the Mississippi river, he was depicted as a "hustler," or male prostitute in the French Quarter, despite only being 17 years old at the time of his death. However, the term "hustler," downplays the reality that Eddie was a victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking starting at an early age.

What began as a podcast about one unsolved case soon turned into a podcast about several similar cases which could all be linked back to one man, former NOPD child abuse detective, Stanley Burkhardt.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/04/new-orleans-stanley-burkhardt-bail-reduction-denied

https://www.scsaorg.org/stanley_burkhardt

https://www.wwltv.com/article/news/investigations/losing-faith/ex-nopd-child-abuse-detective-himself-a-serial-molester-confronted-by-wwl-guardian/289-5c0ca0d6-605c-4da1-afed-6e278b5a6760

https://www.fox8live.com/2025/08/06/former-nopd-detective-convicted-sex-offender-back-jail-facing-new-charges/

https://www.nola.com/news/courts/disgraced-new-orleans-police-detective-long-deemed-sexually-dangerous-gains-release/article_a64de55a-f8fb-11ee-b201-c39f3048b0f6.html

Recently, stories about the payouts to survivors of sexual abuse by the New Orleans Archdiocese, and documentaries, such as Scout's Honor, have touch on some of the overlap between victims of these child abuse networks. However, their connection to Burkhardt, as well as many of the details uncovered by the podcast have received frustratingly little attention.

Despite the clear danger of doing so, Burkhardt was released from prison in 2024, and recently re-arrested for once again violating his parole this past summer. To my own horror, despite listening to this podcast for the past few years, and following updates about Burkhardt, I learned after the fact, that before he was re-arrested, Burkhardt had been working at the local grocery store in my neighborhood.

Had I known this, I definitely would have taken more precautions considering my own child frequently visited the store while he was working there. However, it turns out when Burkhardt's own coworkers were asked if they had been informed about his dangerous history with children and his abuse of his position of authority, even they were completely unaware.

The podcast has been self-funded by the host and donations from listeners throughout its entirety, and somehow, despite all the evidence uncovered by local journalists and the host of the podcast, as well as the wild twists and turns she's discovered while investigating these murders, such as the undeniable overlap between the plot of the TV show True Detective and several cases related to Burkhardt, (It turns out, in addition to being a narcissist and a pedophile, writings left behind in Burkhardt's prison cell after his release in 2024, indicated he also enjoyed writing "fiction." However, in his fictionalized version of events, the detective was usually the hero who made the big break and saved the day.), it remains relatively unknown.

It's a bit convoluted trying to re-explain how eerily so many details behind decades of forgotten cold cases line up with a "fictional" TV show that aired years ago, but I highly recommend listening to this podcast (as a warning, some of the content is very graphic and very upsetting to hear). Much of the information uncovered has been added the long list of evidence against Burkhardt, but it still continues to receive very little attention, even at a local or state level. However, it's important to note, even when these crimes were being actively committed, many attempts to seek justice by survivors of Burkhardt's abuse and family members of the deceased victims, led to dismissal by authorities (often due to stigma at the time regarding sexual abuse and rumors which may have intentionally been spread about the lifestyles of the murder victims), missing evidence, and several other mysterious dead ends.

To give you an example of how unknown this podcast and the very serious charges against Burkhardt have somehow remained even at the most local level, I mentioned it while getting a haircut a few months ago when Burkhardt was most recently re-arrested. The lady cutting my hair had never heard of the podcast, or the connection between the murders, but she had grown up in the same neighborhood outside of the French Quarter, and actually knew Stanley Burkhardt when he was a detective working the Quarter.

That's just to say, please feel free to share the podcast, and information about these murders and Stanley Burkhardt, wherever you feel is appropriate. The victims and their families deserve justice. Even if Burkhardt is finally locked away for good this time, and unable to hurt anymore children, there seems to be no reason to believe that all the powerful networks he was involved with ever stopped commiting crimes. More likely they've just gotten better at hiding in plain sight.

Probably because they seem to be globally thumbing the scales, and it's not the first time wealthy conservatives conspired to do so. Not even the first time in Chile

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/intelligence/2025-12-04/covert-action-chile-significance-church-committee-report-50

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Pete Hegseth explaining we lose to China every time. The guy who fucking lies about everything in the administration who fucking lies about everything.

The guy who did a tour of Europe a few months ago essentially telling our allies they will have to defend themselves because the U.S. won't be dragged into another war.

Then committed a bunch of war crimes against civilians to drag us into yet another "war" because obviously we're trying to plunder a bunch of oil and resources (just like the Bush administration, but even lazier story telling).

The guy who works for the administration that keeps telling us we will have to accept a surveillance state and losing even more civil rights and liberties for our own good, (just like the Bush administration, but even lazier story telling), because it's imperative we win the "AI race" against China.

China, the "greatest threat to our freedom," (even though we sold them the surveillance tech that enabled them spy on their citizens, which in turn helped them gain the lead in the "AI race," which is allegedly why we now have to give up our freedom and accept our own surveillance state in the U.S. Because losing the "AI race" to China is unacceptable), wins every time we try to help defend Taiwan. So I guess we just can't risk helping defend the people we said we would help. Once again.

The last thing I want is a bunch of war hungry NeoCons dragging us into another war, but it looks like that's happening anyway.

So I find this "admission" from Hegseth suspicious, and I believe this is just a way to preemptively lay the groundwork so that once China does what we all know they're going to try to do, and once Russia does what we all know they're going to try to do, the fucking "department of war," is going to have to be hands off because we can't involve ourselves in the fucking war... Even if it's to defend our allies against our own "greatest threats."

Meanwhile we're too busy to even try to help our allies, because we're fighting a hot war we created by picking a fight against somebody weaker than us, and losing a made up "AI race" in the new Cold war. Which we also created as an excuse to hand over insane surveillance capabilities to the U.S. and Chinese governments, so that oligarchs in both countries could get richer helping their governments destroy civil liberty.

It's gone from can't everyone just pay your fair share of taxes?

To can't we at least tax the rich?

How about just the 1%?

Ok..., how about just the 0.001%?

And then somehow conservatives leaders will convince a voter base to take to the streets with pitchforks and torches, claiming it's tyranny, then once they're elected, the leaders will still tax the fucking voter base.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A long, long, looooonnng, time ago, I went on a date to see a movie. This was before smart phones were super common and neither of us really bothered to look into what the movie was about before we went. It was an Adam Sandler movie that came out after Punch Drunk Love (but way before he did anything like Uncut Gems), so we both went in with the expectation it would probably just be a light hearted comedy with maybe a few more serious moments sprinkled in.

We were already in a long term relationship and knew each other pretty well, so it wasn't supposed to be a super romantic date or anything. It was more just lets hang out and spend a fun day together, so I made us some weed brownies and snuck them in to share so we could giggle and watch this funny movie together.

Here is the description of the movie we saw that day:

When seasoned comedian George Simmons learns of his terminal, inoperable health condition, his desire to form a genuine friendship causes him to take a relatively green performer under his wing as his opening act.

We'd already settled in and eaten the brownies, and they were just starting to kick in when we realized this wasn't going to be as light hearted as we thought.

If you've ever ingested THC you might already know that some people can have a much more intense experience compared to what they're used to having from just inhaling it. The person I was dating was one of those people, and eventually he realized he just couldn't handle eating THC, but this date occured several years before he finally accepted that truth.

So, we sit through this movie, and I can't really remember much of what happened other than the general theme of coming to terms with your own mortality. I don't remember it being funny at all. I think there were jokes, but I don't think we actually laughed the entire time except for the opening scene.

The movie finally ends and the credits start to roll. Everyone gets up around us and starts walking out, but when I stood up to leave he stopped me and asked if we could just wait until people cleared out a little more.

I said ok and we just sat there a while longer. The credits were still rolling, but we were the only people left in the theater and the ushers were standing at the back clearly waiting for us to hurry up and get out so they could sweep before the next movie.

He said something about not being able to go back through the lobby, and said he wanted to go out the door near the screen instead because it led directly outside to the parking lot.

We open the door, step out, and I guess it was kind of jarring for him to go from the dark theater directly into the extremely bright sunshine because he started having a panic attack before we could even reach the car.

I tried to calm him down, but he didn't want to talk. We hadn't eaten all day other than the weed brownies so I figured maybe he would feel better if he got some food, but I had also eaten a brownie and I didn't want to drive too far.

Since we didn't have smart phones I couldn't look up what was in the area, but I remembered there was a Chinese buffet pretty close that I had been to once before. I figured that would be a nice quiet place for us to go so he could calm down.

Except when we got there, I guess a family was having a birthday party and it was absolutely packed. It felt more like a giant cafeteria and there were people at every single table talking really loud and celebrating. Then they started playing this same song over and over on a continuous loop like a weird horror movie:

Happy Birthday (Sheng Ri Kuai Le)

Like it would end and then just start up again like it was going to be playing for all eternity. It was so fucking bizarre I couldn't help but start laughing because it was such a weird situation.

He was mumbling "oh my God," over and over, but I thought he was just joking about it being so ridiculous. Then around the 5th time it started up again he was suddenly like "I have to go now!" and basically bolted out the door and back to the car.

We get back in the car, and he goes "I think I'm having a stroke. I need you to call 911!"

So, I tried to calm him down and tell him, Hey, you're ok, you're not having a stroke. I'm pretty sure you're just having a panic attack. Let me just take you home so you can lay down for a while.

He kept begging me to call 911, so I started driving him back home. Then, while I was driving he pulled out his own phone and tried to call 911! and I had to wrestle it away from him with one hand while driving, and, then when I did manage to get it away he screamed at me "You bitch! I can't believe you're going to let me die because you don't want to get in trouble!" 😵‍💫...

There was a good 5 mins or so of total silence where neither of us said anything. I get he was scared, but he'd never said anything like that to me before and I was pretty pissed.

Finally, I just told him if he wanted to go to the ER I would drive him, but if he called 911 and it turned out he was just having a panic attack, he could also end up in trouble.

That seemed to sober him up a bit and he calmed down enough to let me just take him back home for a while. I laid on the bed still annoyed about the whole day and pretty pissed at him while he searched the internet on his desktop to figure out if he was actually having a stroke (btw we had taken the brownies like 3+ hrs earlier by this point).

Finally after looking things up and convincing himself he was indeed having something like a stroke, he said he still wanted to go to the ER. I was so fucking annoyed by this point but I just threw up my hands and said fine, whatever. This is fucking dumb. Lets go.

We don't talk the whole way there, we get to the ER and just sit in this busy waiting room still not talking. Finally they call him back and I stay in the waiting room.

I sat there by myself for an hour or so just kind of rolling my eyes and thinking about how fucking ridiculous it was, and how it had ruined the whole day.

Finally, a chaplain came out into the waiting room and called my name. Then he asks if I'm there with my boyfriend... And for a moment I had my own mini panic attack of "Ohshitohshit did they send the chaplain to tell me he was actually having a stroke the whole fucking time?!"

It turns out that nope, the hospital was just understaffed that day, and he was sent to give me an update. It turns out he was totally fine. It was just a panic attack, and the next day he thanked me for not letting him call 911.

Anyway, that was my worst date that turned into a very shitty day and ended with a visit to the ER.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is like the weirdest IRL trolley problem, but the consequences of the decision are 1 death vs. several people running late or being mildly inconvenienced.

#Utilitarian at all cost *💪🏼 *unless it's me getting mangled

Imagining a fully automated dystopian future where decisions are always predetermined and based on greater good rules. Billionaires can't grasp why we're so ungrateful for the better world they've created, so clearly it must be further proof we don't know what's best for us.

 

I made a community for anyone to recommend any music that motivates you to workout or just get moving.

I added a few songs just to get things going, but it really doesn't have to be any specific genre. Whatever gets your dopamine flowing/gets you motivated to work out or even just get shit done after you've been procrastinating for a while. Please feel free to share or discuss.

Thanks!

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What makes you think oligarchs haven't been continuing to undermine and dismantle the second reconstruction this entire time, and aren't using their established global institutions (like banks, corporations, and conservative think tanks) to do exactly what they've been projecting and accusing progressives of doing?

Do you honestly think there isn't a good chance a global cabal of far right conservatives might be ready to use their collective wealth and resources they hoard and pass down for generations to take full global control?

Example: The CIA and the Royal family working together to overthrow a progressive leader in Australia in the 1970s.

Or Steve Kangas on the Origins of the overclass and the crimes of the CIA

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

I don't really get how that contradicts needing a 3rd reconstruction that dismantles the government agencies that carry out that kind of shit and didn't even exist until WWII rather than dismantling a democracy?

you guys are just upset it is happening at home now and not Iraq.

Can't argue with you there, but that's also part of what makes me question who's best interest would be dismantling U.S. democracy instead of dismantling specific agencies within the government, with no plan for where we go next?

Because it kinda seems like those agencies would carry on doing whatever they want even after a union fully dissolves. They would just have fewer obstacles in their way.

When you think about how an American agency, for example, the CIA operates this playbook in other countries, what is their intended goal?

Their goal is to destabilize a country in order to remove any obstacles to taking full control. They usually achieve destabilization by undermining public trust in a system and the leaders of that system, so that the public will either dismantle the government for them or be less resistant once it is dismantled (see the Soviet Union in the late 80s). Once that happens, they already hold all the resources and power, and install somebody they already have lined up.

Considering that there seems to currently be a global campaign to spread disinformation and install far right leaders across the globe, it makes me question if this is happening everywhere bc global destabilization is the goal.

Currently, just about anywhere in the world, who holds the majority of the resources? The people or a small group of oligarchs? When destabilization happens and a local government collapses who has the upper hand when it comes to filling the power vacuum?

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

The Case for a Third Reconstruction

The scale and depth of the attack on our institutions means that there is no simple way for a pro-democracy coalition to flip the lights back on after Trump. We need transformative thinking.

 

There was a huge explosion yesterday in Tennessee at plant that made explosive material for the military and industrial projects. https://www.newsweek.com/tennessee-explosion-update-no-survivors-found-at-volatile-scene-10865405

Video from a news chopper on the scene right after the explosion shows what looks like green almost glowing debris on the ground https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPooHZbDiee/

Any idea what it is?

 

Trying to figure out what this kid's toy from the dentist is. I tried to look for it online and the only thing that looked similar was a fidget toy/spring like this:

https://www.walmart.com/ip/48-Tiny-Pearl-Plastic-Spring-Toy-Sensory-Fidget-Toy-Party-Favors-Goody-Bags-Rewards-Prizes-Bulk-4-Dozen/358773085

Except this is just a solid piece of plastic. I thought maybe it just needed to be pulled apart, but it broke in half when I tried.

Maybe it's a spring that somehow fused together? No idea what else it could possibly be.

 

This is a long shot, but I am looking for a report listed as a similar case in a citation footnote from an article titled 'What Did You Do during the War?'

https://www.academia.edu/29509000/What_Did_You_Do_during_the_War_Personal_Responses_to_the_Aftermath_of_Nazi_Occupation

This is the full footnote as it is written on page 831 of the article:

76 NARB f. 4p, op. 29, d. 472, ll. 668–69 (letter from the TsK KP[b]B to F. Borisevich, 31 May 1945), l. 669 (Slutsk district party committee report, no later than May 1945). For simi- lar cases, see l. 97 (Vitebsk regional party committee report on the case of E. A. Maslenikovaia, 30 November 1945), l. 580 (Mogilev regional party committee report on the case of V. Luk´ianenko, 1945), l. 587 (Smolevichi district party committee report on the case of S. I. Maltsevaia, 30 May 1945), ll. 618–19 (Pinsk district party committee report on the case of T. V. Buchik, 17 May 1945, and corresponding letter from Buchik); d. 469, l. 283 (Minsk region procuracy report on the case of a woman named Krupinaia, 8 April 1946); d. 510, l. 738 (Berezino district party committee report on the case of Ia. A. Shpakovskii, 24 May 1946).

I am not sure if Ia. is correct or possible a typo, which may actually be referring to single initials I. A.

 

Trying to find this 2012 documentary episode that aired on CUNY TV, but it seems to be nowhere https://tv.cuny.edu/show/cunytv/PR2000828

view more: next ›