this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
823 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

17750 readers
1937 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 132 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Reminder that, per Wikipedia, aflatoxins - the poisons in molds - "are among the most carcinogenic substances known."
Furthermore, aflatoxin B~1~ can permeate through the skin and its LD~50~ can be as low as 300 µg/kg.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

300 migs per kig? Shit, I'll roll the dice on that old manchego slice, I'm a fat cunt.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Are you using "mig" as milligram or microgram? For that to be a term you'd use, I assume you recognize you're responding to a quantity in micrograms.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Micrograms? You mean millicentigrams, commonly abbreviated as mcg by people who avoid proper SI- symbols?

Since milli means 1/10^3 and centi means 1/10^2, I propose millicenti means 1/10^(3*2) or 1/10^6.

Or the extended keycode-averse could just use ug.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I assume your comment is very tongue-in-cheek, in which case it was a fun read. What follows is my response if it isn't.


Well, the top-level comment said μg, which was the basis of my questioning the second-level comment. Not sure where your millicentigrams came from.

Also, your math is weird. You wouldn't multiply your exponents like that, you'd add them. As noted at the top, though, I suspect your whole comment is in jest and the math is meant to be the giveaway aimed at the literal-minded like me.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I know you wouldn't multiply exponents that way unless it's an exponent of an exponent. In any case, it's the only way I can make the term "mcg" actually make sense.
Think of it as giving someone the benefit of the doubt to the point of absurdity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)