"Hate the sin, love the sinner", so to speak.
MajorasTerribleFate
The social contract of tolerance doesn't extend to those who are intolerant. They are outside the protection of Tolerant Society's protection, and the Tolerant are free (and, in fact, strongly encouraged) not to tolerate them, because they aren't covered.
Their right wing is trying to crib some (not all) notes from Trump, so I'd imagine those Canadians are the ones who think what Trump is doing is fine.
Verily, verily.
Fucking hell, that chapter is a mess. God says "Hey Joseph, you're the greatest ever and my one and only priest and whoever you bless, I bless; whoever you curse, I curse. If I sent you a woman, then it's not adultery to sleep with her, because I gave David and Abraham concubines. And when all is said and done, there's a rad throne by my side for you in heaven. Also, Emma, you better sleep with him, and not any other men. I sent you to him so that's all there is to it. You're the best, Joseph, keep it up, you can do no wrong, because I said so [on the special gold plates no one else should be allowed to see]."
I would like to think it's most of them. After all, how awesome would it be to catch the people escaping the social media platforms that are drifting right by creating one or two new ones? No guarantees of success, but it's still something, and you'd quietly have control of it to slowly push them whatever direction might be handy.
History tends to show the cultural memory for stuff like this has a shelf life. It's a little convenient for me to say that my recollection is that it's often about 80 years, because we happen to be 80 years after the end of WW2 right now. But I do feel I've seen that number before for this. It's not that everyone has forgotten over 80 years, but that enough people have either forgotten or changed their minds or softened a bit.
Mariah Carey unfrozen for the Christmas season
And Trump's health plan should be ready in just a couple more weeks by then
I assume your comment is very tongue-in-cheek, in which case it was a fun read. What follows is my response if it isn't.
Well, the top-level comment said μg, which was the basis of my questioning the second-level comment. Not sure where your millicentigrams came from.
Also, your math is weird. You wouldn't multiply your exponents like that, you'd add them. As noted at the top, though, I suspect your whole comment is in jest and the math is meant to be the giveaway aimed at the literal-minded like me.

Definitely one of my favorites, and illustrates the point effectively.