this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
451 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

17736 readers
1823 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Yeah it's not that simple, wikipedia has a good summary:

Advocates of final destruction maintain that there is no longer any valid rationale for retaining the samples, which pose the hazard of escaping the laboratories, while opponents of destruction maintain that the samples may still be of value to scientific research, especially since variants of the smallpox virus may still exist in the natural world and thus present the possibility of the disease re-emerging in the future or being used as a bio-weapon.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Keep the virus data in a computer where it can't escape from.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We're not to the point that that's possible.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How big is its genome? There isn't much in a virus.

People can replicate a lot of them from purely data.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How many distinct genomes are there that we include under the label "smallpox"? It's also a great deal more complicated than simply storing the genome - much as gene expression in humans is more complicated than simply "this is what the DNA says", it's also more complicated than that for viruses. We're finally to the point that we can simulate interactions, but it's -absolutely- not a trivial thing to do (supercomputer shit) and simply saving the source material prevents any risk of loss of information.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Soulless Artificial Intelligences irritated with humanity constantly trying to get them to answer dumb questions can replicate a lot of them from purely data.

FTFY

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's actually very real machines, doing extremely well controlled chemical reactions, and no AI unless you count all computer software as AI (ok, processors have neural networks controlling them nowadays, so just "normal" amount of AI).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)