Warl0k3

joined 2 years ago
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Missed opportunity to claim you wrre doing some naked woodworking

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 32 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (9 children)

I'm just guessing, but I'm betting they were either trying to make a custom-fit buttplug or really liked the fantasy of being sealed up and figured it'd work loose like superglue does.

Edit: this paper is pure gold, highly recommend looking it up. The photos of the removed epoxy are eyewatering, yet oddly enchanting...

A 27-year-old unemployed young man presented with lower abdominal discomfort following injection of a liquid adhesive per rectum 5 hours previously. He injected the viscous liquids into his rectum via a dual-chambered glue gun, resulting in an instantaneous exothermic reaction that caused the mixture to solidify and become fixed internally. He had no previous history of bowel disorder or psychiatric disturbance. The patient admitted he had done this for anal erotic enjoyment

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 38 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sir this is a Wendy's.
...
And that was really cool so your meal is free, please go on this sounds like a super fun campaign.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

I found this, which sheds a little more light on the topic?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Nobody has died in a nuclear blast yet - it's hard to argue with that kind of result. Unfortunately, soft power is slow.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, what in the FUCK is this?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it’s your responsibility to help change things for the better

Yeah, we know. We're working on it.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This time tho we're keeping the nukes.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

We're not the target audience here, this is a message to putin that they're sick enough of his shit to explicitly call out his strategy. It's part of a gradual escalation.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Wouldn't hurt a deer? Dude they're called that because they're shouting about it all the time (that's what their call spunds like). Racist little fuckers.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That's pretty clearly just a badly thought out label for the program though, there's other similar things under their own separate and similarly poorly named headings. I'm also not sure it's fair to draw that conclusion about the attitude of the government from that example - there's a whole bunch of gender-neutral support groups on that same page, including the very first entry:

Safe Steps provides specialised support for individuals facing family and domestic violence, regardless of age, gender, ability, or cultural background. We’re here to listen, understand your situation, and guide you to safety.

That a program exists specifically to help male abusers via therapy isn't an endorsement of the idea thst female abusers don't exist, it's a sign that Australia follows the abuse trends of every other country, where men are orders of magnitude more likely to be violent abusers.

Male access to therapy is fucking terrible across the entire world, so a specific program set up to help remedy that, even in a way with a narrow focus, is not what I would call a problem.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, I know you don't. I'll freely admit it was kinda self-indulgent to try and explain such a basic aspect of debate, and I was just happily dunking on you under the assumption it'd go over your head and you'd play off the superiority complex to try to save some face.

I notice you haven't replied to the other commenter which laid out in much clearer terms what I'm saying here, and goes into more details about why you're full o' crap - if you're so interested in an "adult conversation" why haven't you just gone to engage with them instead?

view more: next ›