undergroundoverground

joined 2 years ago
[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even this one?

2 kings chapter 2 verse 23-24

From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.

God, despite being male presenting identifies as non-binary.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

So, not an anarchist at all then.

I see what you mean, in terms of democracy being a problem capitalism is trying to solve and, also, that the rich and powerful will never allow us to simply vote away their ill-gotten wealth and power.

I don't think that doesn't mean we shouldn't try though or just lament that we were born too late though.

If enough people wanted to, we could change things very quickly. I don't see why that would mean we would have to have those all of those things, let alone for an extended period. Really, you're rationalising a status quo bias.

So go on, walk out the door. Just turn around now. You're not welcome anymore.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Your mad scrambling to not back down over a very silly statement is getting boring now. The fact that you genuinely think that there's literally nothing Germany could ever do to be rid of American soldiers, if they wanted to, is just bizzare and has no basis in reality.

Why wasn’t West Germany invited until six years later?

Because of WW2. You've heard of that one right? Sheer desperation and very little thought going on here.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If they wanted them gone bad enough, they could starve them out. I'm not sure how you've convinced yourself that isn't a possible option for them, if pushed far enough. I'm not saying they will but the idea that they couldn't is just ridiculous.

Nato was formed in 1949 which was before the korea war and was always about preventing soviet aggression. No amount of pretending otherwise will change that. Britain and America had already occupied Germany after ww2 and that didn't officially end until 1955. I get it, you don't like nato but you're not doing you side any favours here.

I mean, what do you expect from a culture that invented hell (Hel)? The Franks liked it so much they adopted it into the Christian Canon, so that there was an "or else."

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I agree that direct confrontation wouldn't work. However, Germany could just refuse to allow anyone to supply food, power, petrol etc. to American bases and they'll have to take themselves home sooner or later or declare open war on Germany.

The reason nato was created was the threat of the soviet Russian empire and continues to exist for almost the exact same reason.