supersquirrel

joined 2 years ago
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Oh come on use your damn brain you are smarter than this, imagine growing up as a queer kid in the middle of nowhere in a very conservative community, can you really not get it through your head that maybe just maybe then the internet might be a lifeline for kids like that? Yes the internet is toxic, but that doesn't mean the internet isn't also a vital lifeline for countless very isolated people... who are isolated against their will.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Then why are you here!!!?? I don't get this blanket cynicism for social media, if you don't like it as a concept than why the hell are you here? Please leave if you truly feel that social media is inherently bad, you are just a toxic influence on this social media community at a fundamental level if that is actually how you feel. Otherwise if you are going to stay you need to think more critically about this and nuance your views.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Wait, do you honestly believe that drinking age laws like the US has leads to less alcoholism, less underage drinking and less deaths from teenagers overdosing on alcohol?

Are you out of your mind?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Mankind isn’t cut out for so much information and communication.

You don't get to decide that for other people

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (28 children)

The idea that Europe is weak is hilarious. Russia invading Ukraine has caused a general rearmament in Europe, this in itself wouldn't make Europe strong but in general European militaries have been proactive about evolving their military technology and doctrine in mostly rational ways and as a result Europe is now a dense fabric of extremely advanced militaries informed by experience from the Ukraine war.

Since WW2 Europe has never been more militarily powerful compared to the US and Russia than it is now. See the rapid development and scaling up of Bohdana 155mm howitzers to 40+ systems a month as one intimidating example.

...which of course is exactly why Trump is insisting Europe is weak lol

Note, I am not arguing the US should cut aid to Ukraine.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

the real chain rule

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What can Ukraine do to exploit a gap in air defenses?

...Have you not been paying attention to the Ukraine's campaign of long range strikes utilizing missiles and drones?

In terms of shell ratios, I am less interested in trying to find precise numbers on that since it is an incredibly difficult process to accurately do for one army much less two, but also I am not sure it is necessarily relevant in any absolute sense since Ukraine and Russia utilize their artillery so differently.

In terms of hard facts that have changed well here you go:

https://defence-blog.com/ukraine-uk-agree-on-joint-artillery-production/

https://defence-blog.com/ukraine-ramps-up-bohdana-howitzer-production-to-40-systems-per-month/

These two changes alone significantly change the strategic power balance between Ukraine's military and Russia's military as the L119 is unquestionably the best mass production battle tested towed light infantry support howitzer ever made and the bohdana in towed and self propelled forms is a world class 155mm howitzer that is easily compatible with a global constellation of militaries who may increase military aid at any point.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

You can go look up the movement of the front over the course of the war. To even out the numbers, we'd have to roughly triple the number of shells we send to the front (ignoring troops for now). That would likely bring the war to a stand still. To start reversing the movement at the same rate we'd likely have to triple it again. So cocktail napkin math says that if we actually want to revert back to pre-invasion borders, we'd have to increase expenditures by around 10x and sustain that for the next 3 years.

I disagree here with this for two reasons.

First Ukraine's artillery shell production and transition into nato calibers of 105mm and 155mm is increasing, and the strategic relation of power balance between Russian and Ukrainian artillery is actively changing. This isn't static, Ukraine is quickly developing an advantage here especially when you consider efficiency of resources applied to the front.

Second, Russian air defenses are collapsing, Ukraine is hammering them day in day out and there is no way Russia can replace these air defense radars and missile launchers along with sufficiently trained crew at a high enough rate to sustain this current situation. Russia is HUGE there is an incredible amount of territory that must be covered with air defense. I would not call the current situation a simple battle of attrition right now, Russia is facing an existential collapse of their war machine if their air defenses decisively collapse in too many areas. I am not suggesting the likelihood is high at the moment but the probability of it happening is meaningfully increasing every day.

I am not trying to reject all of your points, but I think the aspects I have brought up have to be taken into consideration. Ukraine will have the capacity to domestically produce and maintain L119 105mm howitzers, 155mm bohdana production has finally begun to hit stride as well, these are strategic leaps forward in terms of practical infantry fighting power and I find conversations tend to ignore these non-flashy but quite meaningful transformations that have happened over the past year or two for the Ukrainian military. They make this moment of Russia's faltering general offensive a far more fragile position than people generally recognize. This isn't to say Ukraine isn't in a fragile position itself of course. What I am saying is I wouldn't expect the status quo to necessarily continue indefinitely here, it will for some time and then all of a sudden it abruptly won't.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

The secure scuttlebutt protocol is definitely real.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 101 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

When life gives you lemons immediately take note as you may be stuck in a computer simulation, lemons are not naturally occuring and thus life has no lemons to give you, do not be fooled by the illusion your captors erected to keep you stuck in a computer simulation and harvest your brain waves for mining cryptocurrency.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think some kind of "pod" system would be nice where similar posts/crossposts could be visually grouped together like a "pod" of dolphins all surfacing on your feed together in a natural flowing way (randomly assigned color coding maybe?). Seeing one dolphin surface after another should feel like cohesive movement of a pod and any one post should link towards other dolphins in the pod not currently visible too.

You could then as a user "pod" a post by linking it with another post and the resulting feed of newly "podded" posts could itself be a browsable "pod feed".

Obviously a different word than pod may be better, but I like the whale pod metaphor.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Very pretty but it is inhumane to hunt doves just to cut their tail off and throw them back in.

view more: ‹ prev next ›