I mean surely pupils who aren’t displaying misogyny aren’t appropriate candidates for an anti-misogyny behavioural course?
I may need the signpost in flashing neon here.
I mean surely pupils who aren’t displaying misogyny aren’t appropriate candidates for an anti-misogyny behavioural course?
I may need the signpost in flashing neon here.
Fuckn AC/DC
reminiscent of video games causing mass shootings
None of the many scientific studies into this claim has found any evidence of its validity.
Instead there is evidence that it is a byproduct of good ol’ racism, as it is used most often to try to explain why a white child would walk into a school and start killing. Because there must be an external reason right? It’s not like Timmy was one of those inherently violent blacks.
This isn’t about sex ed, it’s about behavioural courses, which wouldn’t be appropriate for most children, just as it wouldn’t be appropriate to send every child who does something wrong to a referral unit.
What’s the weird restriction?
Well this is going to be one of the battles in the case. The Panorama episode in question was never aired in the US, but the Trump team argue that VPN use means some Floridians may have accessed it. The BBC’s team will seek to argue that such use isn’t significant enough to cause reputational damage to Trump in Florida.
This is basically a shake-down. So far, American media has rolled over and written it off as the cost of doing business. He may think that would be the case here.
BBC America is a subsidiary of AMC Networks.
He is filing in Florida because he is resident there.
Maybe then the problem is the people?
Murder isnt just cheap in the US, it’s highly prized. They fetishise their military over there. Private companies employ armed guards. Its sick.
And because its already known, there’s no cost to reiterate it.
You expect the security services to air the good stuff in a press conference?
That wasn’t the part I was querying, I was asking about the “weird” restrictions.