Fire twitter post that reads as incompetence to anyone who matters in their field... Yeah....
fushuan
You do need to do that though.
If someone wants to read further information they need the citations.
You are supposed to cite all your relevant previous works in each paper you publish.
That includes OP and other comments here that also misinterpreted their comment confidently though. Like, read the title, that's not what they said at all.
Luckily the one that responded them corrected them, but if instead of being educated they received the hate from these comments they'd go way crazier.
Edit: idk why I assumed the comment was from a woman, I'm sorry. I changed all pronouns to they/them.
They aren't blaming the victim, they are too stupid to realise that wrongful conviction means that the convicted didn't do the crime. They think that they were convicted for a wrongful action aka they were guilty.
Victim blaming no. Dumb beyond remedy, yeah.
I guess that could be misinterpreted, but yeah, that sentence means that he is putting special attention on those measures, and doubling down on it by proposing even harsher measures.
In a paragraph below you have it clearer:
Speaking to the right-wing broadcaster Welt TV, he raised the question of whether elderly people should still be prescribed expensive medication. He said there are “phases in life when certain medications should no longer be used.” He cited the example of a 100-year-old man suffering from cancer and asked, “Do we really want to use these expensive drugs” in such a case?
You see that he is clearly advocating pro those inhumane changes.
Nope, both are against giving meds to the elderly. What are you misunderstanding?
Please give me you bank account password, it's all out there anyway.
I doubt that since the comment was a suggestion to read and cite herself. If she did cite herself the assumption would be that she did read the citations so the comment would be moot, no? Why would they suggest to cite herself if she already did?
They only anonymize the author, not the citations right?