bitjunkie

joined 2 years ago
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Drank Too Much Wine green

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I need to get more motivated about this. Can I take a listen?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I took OP's wording to mean re-incarcerating them for the same crime, although it's not explicit in that either now that I'm looking at it again. Anyway yeah let them rot, idgaf what for. They got Capone on tax evasion. 🤷‍♂️

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

✨Have the day you voted for 🥰

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

You're looking at it, bud.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I believe his name is Tom Antifa

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Community can be achieved without treating patent nonsense as fact.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Recidivism doesn't have anything to do with being re-incarcerated for the thing they were originally incarcerated for.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hahahahha what a bunch of thin-skinned losers

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure that to re-incarcerate someone after they were pardoned would require a new trial, which would violate the double jeopardy clause.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

a tax law that grows exponentially

We've had this before, and can again. Look up FDR-era marginal rates.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (6 children)

It isn't. Both things are dumb, but in order to live in a free society, we have to let people be dumb, even if it's not our specific kind of dumb.

view more: next ›