SpookyBogMonster

joined 2 years ago
[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

Please learn how the 'social credit' system actually works before spouting off

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Idk I'd live there if I had the chance. The trains seem neat ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

I can't believe you lick the boots of the Paw Patrol

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 31 points 3 days ago

God forbid women do anything

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

The worst thing here might just be Google. You can't search any of that shit on there now without getting slop

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

So what you're describing is a concept called Blanquism, which predates the concept of a vanguard party.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

This assumes that a vanguard is a separate class, when what it really is, is an advanced segment of the working class. That said, I wanna inject some good faith complexity here.

A Maoist critique of a a vanguard would assert that, by being the most advanced segment of the working class, a petty bourgeois element can exist within a party.

In the maoist view, since class struggle persists under socialism, that petty bourgeois element can, wittingly or otherwise, lead the socialist state back to capitalism. And as such, this needs to be struggled against.

The solution to this isn't to discard the concept of a vanguard, after all most socialist revolutions, which have seized power, have featured them.

Rather, Maoism has the concept of The Mass Line, wherein the party seeks to intimately involve itself with the masses. And the Cultural Revolution, where the class conscious masses are unleashed on the party itself, to keep it in check. Hence the Cultural Revolution slogans like, "its right to rebel" and "Bombard the headquarters"

I'm not a Maoist (I find the maoist position on AES to be lacking), but it's a tradition I have respect for. There's this big emphasis on the dialectic between top-down and bottom-up power that's really worth exploring, I think. I once heard it jokingly called "Anarcho-stalinism" and I hope you can see why lol

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Only if you have the most superficial, half-baked, reading comprehension skills on God's green earth.

Racism is a deeply rooted set of systems and ideologies that arose to justify and reinforce institutions of chattel slavery, segregation, and police brutality.

Tankie is a goofy sounding British slang term from 60+ years ago, entirely divorced from its original context, used on a tiny collection of web forums

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

The word Tankie originates from 1950s British Communist circles. Specifically, it was used by British Communists to derisively describe their comrades who supported the 1956 invasion of Hungary by the Soviet Union.

Images of the Soviet invasion featured a lot of tanks, hence, “Tankie”.

After that died down, the term didn’t come back into use really, until the 2010s, when leftists on the internet started using it in a tongue-in-cheek sort of way. It was fun to bring back a stupid sounding, incredibly niche, British slang word.

At some point the word breached containment and started to be used by liberals, in a very cavilier sort of way. I’ve seen people use Tankie to describe anyone from Marxist-Leninists, to Marxists generally, to Leftists generally, weird right-wingers who converted to Russian Orthodoxy, pro-Palestine activists, mods of Lemmy instances someone doesn’t like.

Shit, I’ve seen literal Anarchist get called Tankies.

Basically, it’s a meaningless nothing word now, that’s a bit like your boomer grandpa who still thinks it’s the Red Scare, calling Joe Biden a Commie Pinko.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

had to escape Venezuela after Maduro took power

they'd become rich under the old system

.... They didn't flee from Chavez? What's the timeline here?

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Venezuelan communes and participatory democracy is flourishing. In addition, massive social programs have been implemented, focusing on housing, food security, and poverty eradication

I think this really needs to be stressed. Venezuela is a country building Socialism. Maduro and the PSUV is in power because of a genuinely incredible mass movement of communes, neighborhood committees, and other organs of grassroots democracy. This is qualitatively different from say, any of the Gulf oil monarchies

I highly recommend the books Building The Commune: Radical Democracy in Venezuela, and Commune or Nothing: Venezuela's Communal Movement and Its Socialist Project, for a look at these aspects of Venezuelan politics, because it's often papered over in discussions about the country.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago

Marxist does not get to exclusively define what imperialism is

Marxism isn't the only analytical lens out there, no. But the people you're arguing with are working with that definition, which is why I took the time to clarify. Thank you for appreciating my effort post though lol

view more: next ›