Humanius

joined 2 years ago
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't Stop Me Now is great too

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Most people aren't cheering that we are rearming, but they understand that it is a necessary evil.

Russia is right at our doorsteps and is increasingly aggressive. So we either rearm in the hope that that threat keeps Russia at bay, or we don't and will hopelessly lose if Russia invades.

Personally I prefer the first option.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At this moment they are discussing doing that, but that does not mean it has already passed or is going to pass

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I believe the point is not to replace the existing carreer soldiers, but to train up part of the population to increase the size of your reserve forces.

That way, if war were to break out, you have a pool of trained civilians to draw from until you finish training your new recruits.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Fire the trade bazooka!
Quality news headline right there

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any specific reason why they should be phones older than 2020?

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm also Dutch and I still occasionally use it when I want to be polite to an older person I do not know very well, or to someone who is in a position where I want to show a certain form of "respect" (higher social standing?)

That is probably also why the government uses "u" in its communication. It is proper to be seen as being respectful to your citizens. And saying "jij" after "u" is less likely to offend anyone than saying "u" after "jij"

The rules are a bit vague when you are supposed to use it, and most people will go "zeg maar jij hoor" (you can say [informal] you) after you start with "u" (formal you)