this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
233 points (97.6% liked)

Privacy

43836 readers
356 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Waterfox is fantastic! I also self host searxng and have it set as the default search engine in waterfox. private search!

[–] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I just switched to it on my android. Set as default. So far so good. Never heard of it until today.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wish people would stop talking about "AI browsers" like everyone even knows what that actually means.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

At this point nothing will stop me having a visceral negative reaction to AI being added to any product after literally every single other implementation in literally every other product has been annoying fucking dogshit. It could be the best thing ever and I'd still react negatively because I never want to hear the god damn word again.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

Every company wants AI even though they have no idea how it helps their business or their company.

My grocery store app does not need AI when they can't even get search right.

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

I wish everyone would stop talking about AI…

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have an interesting take. They're not against AI per se, they're against AI they can't audit. It was an interesting read.

The problem with forks such as Waterfox is that they don't get fixes as quick as the mainline browser. But, this is also somewhat of a myth. When Mozilla fixes something in Firefox, they don't push the update out to everyone right away. Some people don't get it for days. Someone who uses a privacy-centric fork like Waterfox is going to be more apt to stay on top of the updates, so even if it takes a day or two for Waterfox to integrate the fix, Waterfox users are likely updating before a lot of Firefox users. And even then, the chances of the average user being affected by whatever is being fixed is typically low, so it's better to have for browsing, but it's not like something that is constantly threatening you — in most cases.

That said, I use Firefox, and I was able to disable the AI stuff. Saw it, said nope, saw the option to disable, did so, and have been happy ever since. I don't always agree with Mozilla, but, I have been curious about forks and I have used Waterfox in the past. It's fine. It might be better, especially for "default settings" Firefox users, but for someone with a relatively low threat level and an intermediate to high skill in hardening browsers (my own assessment, subject to bias), I'm not particularly bothered by using regular Firefox. And if you're subscribed to a Privacy community (or subreddit), you probably shouldn't be, either, but then again, only you can judge your own threat level. There are certainly situations where something like Waterfox would be preferred.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The new CEO isn't talking about the AI that's already in Firefox. He's talking about more AI with greater integration.

"Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions."

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

Ah, so speculation. I speculate that AI will decide we're not useful and go all Skynet/Matrix on us. I sure hope I'm wrong. But if I try to sell you a doomsday bunker, you have every right to laugh in my face.

Who knows what Firefox will look like tomorrow? I do agree it's important to keep options open, knowing about Waterfox, LibreWolf, IceCat, and maybe some others.

[–] khornechips@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We here at $brand think your car should be more than just a car… that’s why we’re now including a panini maker in all models! And no, you can’t take it out of the trunk. Just don’t use it if you don’t want it, silly!

[–] degen@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago

... Why did I read it as panty (panni?) maker?

I blame panini for being an uncommon word

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Will they have an android version on f droid ? Prefer not to use Google play...

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago

No https://search.f-droid.org/?q=waterfox and they don't seem to list it on their official page either. Please show your interest at https://github.com/BrowserWorks/waterfox/issues/4002

[–] Libb@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Disclaimer: very satisfied user of Waterfox talking ;)

But I believe Mozilla is making a fundamental mistake.

I believe that too, but I'm no millionaire CEO either.

Some will argue that AI browsers are inevitable, that we’re fighting against the tide of history. Perhaps. AI browsers may eat the world. But the web, despite having core centralised properties, is fundamentally decentralised. There will always be alternatives. If AI browsers dominate and then falter, if users discover they want something simpler and more trustworthy, Waterfox will still be here, marching patiently along. We’ve been here before. When Firefox abandoned XUL extensions, Waterfox Classic preserved them. When Mozilla started adding telemetry and Pocket and sponsored content, Waterfox stripped it out. I like to think that where there is want for a browser that simply respects you, Waterfox has delivered.

Long live Waterfox.

This may sound silly to say, and it probably is, but to me it's almost impossible to imagine I could one day stop being a Firefox user. I mean, my first Web browser was Mosaic, I followed it when it turned into Netscape, which I then followed as it became Netscape, before morphing into the giant Mozilla T-Rex, and finally becoming Firefox.

Take back the Web, I believe(d) in that. Heck, I still have one of their T-Rex t-shirt dedicated by a few of its devs.

I also have a chromium-based browser (Vivaldi) but Firefox has always been home to me (edit: so seeing it moving away from what I care for is not a great feeling). I'm so glad forks like Waterfox exist because if it was not for them, for the first time ever I would not know what browser I can trust.

[–] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I first started on Mosaic and Lynx! That was a lifetime ago.

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I am still using lynx, everyday. Not for everything, but for most if my news and blog reading.

It feels great to not being bombarded by the flashy, distracting JavaScript gizmo du-jour. I want to read the content, I don't care about the AI generated picture at the of the page, or the random picture of something half related to the article.

I believe everybody should build their website to be accessible with lynx.

Accessibility isn't just following the standards and removing the mess from the modern web, it's also making your site accessible for the people with eyesight problems for example...

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im looking at changing now.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

male to female

To waterfox instead of Firefox

[–] m33@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Firefox clones like librewolf and waterfox greatly increase the supply chain attack risk, but they seems more and more attractive every day

[–] exu@feditown.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We still need some organisational alternative to Mozilla. None of the privacy forks would survive Firefox going away.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Yes all the derivatives would die if Firefox went away.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Waterfox might have just got a new convert here.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I just switched from Firefox to waterfox. It took less than five minutes, and the installation is quite straightforward on Linux. Move the folder to opt, make a symlink, and create a .desktop. The instructions are on the website. I suggest switching the default search to duckduckgo.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm currently in the process of switching to Waterfox while I wait to see what Ladybird can do, and so far I'm pretty happy with my decision.

[–] freeman@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does anyone know about Zen browser, if they stay abstinent as well?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Don't get me wrong I hate LLMs being shoved down our throats, but I think the "Mozilla using AI" stuff is overblown. The few LLM features they've implemented are useful and non-intrusive. I actually think it's a rare example of the tech being used intelligently (no pun intended).

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These things have been incredibly intrusive. They even added a whole sidebar to take up more space like they were fucking Yahoo and this was IE.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weird, I don't have a new AI sidebar and I'm running the latest version.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I’ve been distro hopping lately, and I’ve discovered that if you don’t turn the sidebar off before you log into your Mozilla account, it will turn the sidebar back on on all of your other Firefoxes (as well as other settings like the studies).

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I could not disagree more. a browser is a local piece of software to me that I use to connect to a variety of servers. It having an ai server its communicating with all the time and with access outside the add on system is not something I want. I have looked at and was not put off by other firefox "controversies" but this one is making it where it is not simply a browser anymore. which is what I want.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I wonder how long before someone says "Having to wait for security patches to be made only when new exploits are discovered is inefficient, we need an AI agent running all the time, inspecting every command, to respond immediately if an exploit is found." and then they just stop security patches and you need that AI crap consuming ram and energy like hell while sending all your data to the mothership.

load more comments
view more: next ›