Unironically, studying economics while caring about other people is what radicalized me. It's just not that hard
this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
367 points (97.7% liked)
Lefty Memes
6334 readers
1121 users here now
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.
If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.
Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!
Rules
0. Only post socialist memes
That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)
0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility
(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)
We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if theyβre too complex.
We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.
When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.
0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms
When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart
- ofc => OFC
- af = AF
- ok => OK
- lol => LOL
- bc => BC
- bs => BS
- iirc => IIRC
- cia => CIA
- nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
- usa => USA
- prc => PRC
- etc.
Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them
1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here
Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.
2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such
That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.
3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.
That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).
4. No Bigotry.
The only dangerous minority is the rich.
5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.
(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)
6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.
- Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:
- Racism
- Sexism
- Queerphobia
- Ableism
- Classism
- Rape or assault
- Genocide/ethnic cleansing or (mass) deportations
- Fascism
- (National) chauvinism
- Orientalism
- Colonialism or Imperialism (and their neo- counterparts)
- Zionism
- Religious fundamentalism of any kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Thatβs the invisible hand right there, fisting the working class more than it has in a hundred years.
Actually, according to Adam Smith, the meet of offer and demands has an equilibrium, **if and only if ** :
- everyone could join and leave the market
- the information is pure and perfect
- the joining of leaving of anyone on the market would not affect the market
- and a fourth one I have forgotten (it was 15 years ago t.t)
Leaving without contraint mean that I would not affect you life to stop participate in this market. It may mean that things needed are not on the market, or if their are, that it would be provided by another mean outside the market.
It also mean that advertisement should be ban, or that the information of what exists on the market is very accurate. I was looking for the political system the most compatible with this theory, and I found councilism. And then, I discovered the whole name is fucking Council communism. I was radicalized from libtard to commies by Adam Smith, this how this society is absurd.
The question is why politics, rich people and bosses never appli the most basics principles of the theory they are supposed to use: Historical materialism and stuff
Counterpoint: you're quoting a book like a nerd instead of doing cocaine. obvious commie, we don't need to listen to you.
Isn't one thing also that the market participants have to act rationally and in their own self interest (without mass manipulation or even delusion).
Great use of the word "class" π€
Kobasu doesn't deserve to be associated with these ghouls. She was a good girl.
These conclusions must be hard science because we used math and numbers!
It's just natural, ignore how many things we do as a species that aren't natural, the suffering must be protected.
This makes perfect rational sense, I am going to base my whole identity on curved lines.
Have this saved in a folder for years
The interesting thing is that IRC plenty of economists think negative externalities (costs imposed on third parties) should be factored into price. That way the market would actually be fairer, more free, and more efficient.
For example, often the price of a product doesn't include the environmental cost. So for example product A is cheaper to make than product B when you include the environmental cost. But manufacturer B is able to pass the environmental cost on to the tax payer, so the sale price of product B is cheaper in shops, and manufacturer A can't compete. It's effectively a subsidy of inefficient and unethical companies. The product which in total costs less to make has a higher sale price than the more expensive product, because we as tax payers and a society are effectively subsidizing the less efficient and more polluting manufacturer. That's the opposite of a free market.
This happens all the time, even if you ignore direct subsidies. Whether it's meat, oil products, stuff made in countries with lax regulation (and even more negative externalities), stuff made by underpaying workers and forcing them to rely on the government(and tax payer) aid, etc. etc.
Obviously, this is the kind of wealth distribution and inequality society and the media rarely see as problematic, because it is so deeply ingrained. But never let the right tell you wealth distribution is a taboo. They're quite happy with wealth distribution when it suits them or their masters.
The Wealth of Nations made convincing arguments that mercantilism wasn't the most effecient system. Paid laborers cost less than slaves. Hoarding [gold] bullion makes it abundant in your country, thus less valuable.
It may be time for the next system. The manifesto will need arguments that appeal to one's pragmatism rather than sense of charity (48 Laws of Power, Law 13, Robert Greene).
You're posting on an anarchist instance and I think federate with the tankie instances.
Amoral arguments for doing the right thing abound. Nobody gives a shit. Its a cult. They need to be dragged out bodily,and the leaders shot.
that graph gives me ap macro ptsd
i've never hated a class so much in my life
The demand for billionaires decreases, while supply has increased, which means their value should drop
Edit: changed increasing demand to decreasing