this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
333 points (99.1% liked)

World News

51321 readers
1566 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/54713532

President Donald Trump's administration wants the International Criminal Court to amend its founding document to ensure it does not investigate the Republican president and his top officials, a Trump administration official said, threatening new U.S. sanctions on the court if it did not.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251210120244/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-threatens-new-icc-sanctions-unless-court-pledges-not-prosecute-trump-2025-12-10/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 days ago

As an American, I beg the ICC not to capitulate and investigate the fuck out of the entire trump administration.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

"Why would we prosecute him?"

"J-j-just don't!"

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

As an American, No.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 195 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Threatening sanctions against the ICC if they investigate you. How to know you are the wrong side of history 101.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I feel like we need to add a rule to the Evil Overlord Handbook over this one.

"I will not threaten international governing bodies for prosecuting me for my crimes.

I will not do anything that is a clear admission of my crimes to the public."

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 101 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Honestly, that is when you start the prosecution of Trump...This is a sign that the US Government is flailing about like an absolute loon, these homegrown fascists have a lot to lose if Trump is properly prosecuted.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 94 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Whenever I've done nothing wrong, I like to make that clear by going down to the courthouse and threatening judges not to charge me with anything.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just tell law people, "I am the law," and that usually works out for me.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I dredd to think what you tell people when you've actually broken the law

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

This, but more "I like to send my army down to the courthouse". This is the kind of thing you can only get away with if you think you can successfully intimidate the court into not going after you.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Can you imagine a random innocent person just going to the courthouse out of the blue and trying to blackmail judges to not charge them with anything

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hate what the US has become under MAGA.

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So you've never heard of the American Service-Members' Protection Act, known informally as the Hague Invasion Act enacted in 2002. Which protects American war criminals by invading the Hague if necessary.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago

Yeah, sure. If somehow Trump, or any other MAGA like Miller or Hegseth, ends up in the box at The Hague, there is no way that the military will crank up to rescue him. He'll be on his own. There might be a lot of PedoCon squealing, but that will just be funny.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jesus Christ... America needs to be bonked in the head until they start having some common sense.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Trump and MAGA is really just showing what US has always been, which the country pretends not to be.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

is it bad i'm just kinda glad they finally went completely masks-off?

republicans used to be able to atleast pretend they werent bloodthirsty psychopaths when the cameras were rolling, and dems could passably act as controlled opposition when it was their turn to play pretend.

trump is just so batshit stupid and sociopathic that the entire facade is undone.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Not that it did any good. He was re-elected.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

is it bad i’m just kinda glad they finally went completely masks-off?

I understand this take, but honestly, there are things missing from it.

I think, like Vonnegut wrote, that we are what we pretend to be, and when we let them as a society get away with not even pretending to be good people...we worsen society overall.

There is another element to this as well, IMO, which is that people are mostly animals: monkey see, monkey do. When people see these psychopaths in high-powered positions getting away with whatever they want, they are more likely to model that behavior as well.

I'd rather have a society where everyone is pretending to be nice over one where people feel free to be the absolute worst version of themselves. I also think that being who you are pretending to be has a good side. People can "pretend" to be good and become better because of it.

People think that the more these people are obviously evil, the less the public will agree with them and the more precarious they'll make the entire escapade. I think that the 2024 election and all of the events of 2025 have proven that notion is a dangerous fiction.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

I've been of the same idea of the other user, but you have a very good point here.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Personally I will take oppressed racists over oppressing racists any day of the week.

Also while things are worse now, Republicans have been unapologetically evil for at least 40 years.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Personally I'd rather all racists burn, oppressed or not

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's exactly why the world needs a strong and capable ICC.

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

And this is why we not only need to reduce our dependence on China in the long run but also our dependence on the US.

There's just no way a sovereign state live while depending on US monopolies.

The US has had the Hague Invasion act on the books as law since 2002. Trump is once again showing us the roadmap to American Fascism has been here a while just waiting for someone to see how far it goes.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

Well thats one way to admit your are guilty.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What is the deal with this orange orangutan? The rightwing conservative movement can throw him under the bus and get a new idiot to lead their movement .... so why hang the fate of your movement on this moron? Seriously ... they could find a younger, stronger more charismatic individual to lead them that would be ten times more dangerous than this aging orange deformed sea lion.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You did read where they said charismatic, right?

Vance's "charisma" couldn't fight it's way out of a paper bag.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

The president had no rizz for us and tons for maga voters. Plus that's the default if they yeet the president or he dies.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In theory they could and I think that's what they were setting Kirk to be once Trump croaks, but then his neck did that thing. A lot of the problem is that the current crop of right wingers both the base and the leaders are fucking lunatics that are broadly crippled by their own egos and madness.

Just look at their propagandists, it's gone from Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh to fucken Asmingold and Catturd. Sure the old ones were still just as horrific and stupid but at least they vaguely attempted to be respectable. I think this devolution has been broadly effective across the board, from the highest elements like Musk and Thiel to the lowest dregs listening to some inane podcaster on the way to work.

I legit don't think they have anyone outside of Trump who can rally their base on a unified level anymore, so they stick to him hoping they can solidify their gains before the whole damned thing implodes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The aging sea lion enables the Stephen Millers to go about their nasty business while everyone is looking elsewhere. That's one way he's dangerous. The other is that he's a threatened malignant narcissist with dementia and diminishing impulse control, and one of the world's most powerful armies.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

MAGA and charisma don't really seem to have any overlap. Miller is some kind of ghoul, Vance is charmless schlub, Hegseth is a Neonazi used car salesman, Bondi is the Karen meme brought to life, Patel is clearly some kind of moron in spite of somehow achieving a law degree, Kennedy is also some sort of Nepo-moron, Oz is a scheister and snake oil salesman .. it goes on.

You could look outside the admin but even those clowns have the likeability of a building site portaloo. Like what the fuck is wrong with Jesse Watters? He looks like a possessed ventriloquist dummy and he has the morals of someone who is devoid of a soul. Musk and Theil are detached from reality, I mean Theil is literally running around given lectures on the end times.

Kirk was about as close as they seem to be able to get to a functioning human being and his ideas and morals were straight out of Mein Kampf and the KKK code of conduct.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Counter with a demand for a bribe not to investigate Trump. Then investigate him anyway. What possible jurisdiction could such an “agreement” even be upheld?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

What the fuck is this shit? This is a fucking stick up!

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a perfect opportunity to bring the court case forward, and when he inevitably doesn't turn up (not that he would have if everything ran to the original timetable), make the finding in absentia, presumably "guilty" but at least worse than it would be if he'd bothered to turn up, and then...

Sanctions? Heck. What else do we have to hold him to account? An ever bigger tariffs war? Forcibly close US embassies and consulates? Seize US assets?

It'd be a fine line to prevent the Big (cutter of) Cheese from bugging out and declaring war.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

that is extortion covered up with the word "pledge".

the media is complicit.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's a trap! Don't do it ICC!

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump is not satisfied enough with making a joke of our country. He now wants to make a joke of the world. He can't die soon enough.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No... Its worse. Hes basically selling us, and the country to foreign interests that also happen to be our enemies

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

let them do it. make them the villains to the world.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Oh that boat sailed a while ago...

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I feel the G7 will soon be the G6

load more comments
view more: next ›