this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
39 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

40553 readers
75 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

F150s will kill a lot more people though

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

yet, the F150's are considerably more destructive to the planet. lol

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

this is what it looks like when your military procurement isn't centered around the profit motive

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

But at what cost ? ..no, wait.. never mind..

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

The missile probably has better range too

[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But can you put a massive non functional lift kit on the missile?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Depends, are you China? Because if not, then probably not.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool, two super pointless things that cost a lot of money.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

Not so pointless when the burger reich is surrounding you with military bases.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've read analysts who say that the price is unrealistically low. I think the same.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's right, if one thing western analysts are famous for it's never being wrong about China's tech capabilities.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

Even if it's 10 times more expensive it's still half to quarter price of Tomahawk missile.