this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
247 points (94.6% liked)

Science Memes

17750 readers
2113 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 30 points 1 week ago (19 children)

So the thing is, "observe" here means that you want to look at an electron to see which path it's taking. How do you "observe" it? By hurling a photon at it, at light speed, it smashes into the electron, changing its course, and then back to you.

Once you define what's actually happening, it becomes a lot less mysterious why "observation" changes the results.

[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think the point of this exepirement is not to observe an electron to see its path, but the fact of obversion itself. Because without obsevation it takes both paths.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

obversion

obsevation

I was hoping that by observing your comment these would collapse into the spelling "observation."

[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Obsevation is just a typo, but wtf is obversion?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago

Obversion is a "type of immediate inference in which from a given proposition another proposition is inferred whose subject is the same as the original subject, whose predicate is the contradictory of the original predicate, and whose quality is affirmative if the original proposition's quality was negative and vice versa".[

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)