California officials are warning foragers after an outbreak of poisoning linked to wild mushrooms that has killed one adult and caused severe liver damage in several patients, including children.
The state poison control system has identified 21 cases of amatoxin poisoning, likely caused by death cap mushrooms, the health department said Friday. The toxic wild mushrooms are often mistaken for edible ones because of their appearance and taste.
“Death cap mushrooms contain potentially deadly toxins that can lead to liver failure,” Erica Pan, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “Because the death cap can easily be mistaken for edible safe mushrooms, we advise the public not to forage for wild mushrooms at all during this high-risk season.”
Rather, don't touch it, and if you do, wash your hands (in the woods? Come up with something that does not bruise!). These things might have so high load that even stains or spores could screw you up.
is that right? i thought it was safe to chew up death caps as long as you dont swallow any
I dont think you can absorb it through your skin regardless. At least, afaik. I've been handling them with bare hands every season for years now, hopefully i'm not doomed
You are correct. Taste is actually a common part of identification. You have to digest it to get hurt. But I personally just don't mess with ID'ing agaricus. There are a few choice primo ones, a couple that will kill you, and a whole bunch that are just bleh, and might make you violently vomit. And they are just so close in appearance, I leave them be.
Which Agaricus will kill you? I'm not aware of any in the PNW.
Edit: I think I remember having this conversation before, you're using "Agaricus" to mean "all gilled mushrooms" like it's the 18th century instead of what it actually means today.
Using Agaricus to include Amanitas. And several of my current books still do that.
I would maybe start saying 'agarics' instead to prevent confusion.
Fair advice, thanks
according to iNat observations A. phalloides is found in that area, though uncommon
That's an Amanita, not an Agaricus.
haha my bad, idk why i thought i read Amanita