this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
1396 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

17736 readers
2447 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I did the math for another post and if I remember right the best telephoto lens built into a very recent phone camera has equivalency to around 120mm (anything else is just digital zoom and sometimes AI enhance).

It's a relatively new gimmick, and it can do wildlife photography from afar (I got some good full body shots of deer recently), but it's not quite as good as 600mm or the 1000mm from the other post.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yes, but there's so much more to compositing a good shot than just focal length. I'm recommending to a new hobbyist to walk before they run. Framing, lighting, perspective - a cheap phone from 2019 off eBay is still better than what your grandparents had, and is better than cameras from 99% of human history.

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Cheap phone from 2019 is better than medium format film wat?! Better than 35mm film?! I dont see it.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, went and did research (gasp!) and found I had been lied to! Or at least to say it's complicated. My statement does have merit in that yes! The most popular cameras from 2019 average 25 megapixels, and that puts it neck and neck to several uses of film (frequently animated uses).

I still think my primary argument is unchanged, but the precise details of my statement are somewhat hyperbolic. In my defence, "better than film" has been the marketing for at least a decade and there are things that digital photography shine at.

Still, thank you for keeping me in check.

https://www.learnfilm.photography/the-resolution-of-film-negatives/

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

i think your argument stays. photography is a mix of lot more things and attributes than just resolution.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)