zjti8eit

joined 2 years ago
 
[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Primal is trash and not an actual client. Yeah if you are on an instance like Mastodon.social that blocks half the ',verse it will look like we're squeaky clean on this side of the bridge .

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

If you can go 4 out of 5 posts without seeing Bitcoin stuff it's love to copy your relay list.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks. FYI it's not tracking links, njump.me is at to communicate NOSTR ecosystem in the HTML net.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago

Here's your NOSTR profile https://njump.me/nprofile1qqs2phh6v0pgs48yz9k933x2r9fu9va4c72gen3va5gphx2lzptp7ucpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43z7ysvs3l

Similarly Jay Graber Blue Sky cEO from their ATProto account https://njump.me/nprofile1qqsvuef74pfa6xfyl072p8wcdffahh0s8gsctnjjrwgxmvlkszmxlfcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43z7s54fl6

you can follow rabble using this webfinger @npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240@momostr.pink or David Ross @derekross-grownostr.org@mostr.pub from your mbin instance.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This isn't the first time I've heard someone on lemmy claim that, but I will say having spent time on botth sides of the 'verse and I've seen more facists on various corners of the ActivityPub based 'verse than in NOSTR.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

ATProto and Matrix are both part of the 'verse too, XMPP and Email too.

There are at least two different applications Mostr and momostr that allow communication between nostr and ActivityPub users. For some reason Lemmy doesn't federated properly between them, and it doesn't seem a high priority for either side to look into.

 

This survey was created so the Nostr community can better understand itself and help advance the Nostr protocol and ecosystem.

The Fediverse is the network and NOSTR is one of its protocols.

 

"The EU Council has just greenlit a new "chat control" mandate, effectively signing a blank check for mass surveillance draped in the language of child protection. This time, it drops the explicit obligation for companies to scan all private messages but quietly introduces what opponents describe as an indirect system of pressure. It rewards or penalizes online services depending on whether they agree to carry out 'voluntary' scanning, effectively making intrusive monitoring a business expectation rather than a legal requirement.

This isn't a slippery slope; it's a lubricated slide into a panopticon."