skeptomatic

"How about you explain how it's not sexist?"
Because if it was a guy who chose to be a stay at home dad and his bread-winner-wife divorced him and he cried about it on the internet, I'd also say he'd get child support and alimony.
Give your balls a tug.

"Fucking gross.." Lol.
You wanna web-stalk my comments and carry over a topic from a different thread here, alrighty, only a few points, which pertain to that thread.
You're stuck in your little echo-chamber-masterbatorium, worried about someone turning off your porn more than the economic and societal outcomes sites like OnlyFans create.
You wrap your defence in this fake anti-misogyny/anti-sexism flag, as if creating the conditions that lead women to do OnlyFans type sex work doesn't itself come from a misogynistic place.
You quote my joking replies to those that made a joke to me or tried to come at me with nothing but an insult, to try to paint me as sexist? Tha. Fuck. Lol.
As if the opinion that the incel types shouldn't pay for OnlyFans and should instead maybe go work on themselves is misogynistic.
As if the opinion that an individual in sex work, the oldest profession as they say and also one that requires nearly zero skill, should not accrue more value than a doctor or lawyer who has to take on great debt and great time to learn their trade and benefit society, is a point of view that comes from misogyny or sexism.
Your position is like saying, a McDonalds fry cook should be paid more than a teacher.
Porn is just an attraction. If tomorrow a fat guy eating French fries on cam (which in this day and age probably exists somewhere lol) became attractive enough that he made 30 to 100 grand a month, I'd have the same opinion on that as I do about OnlyFans. I think so would most people.
You're trying to make that opinion, anti-woman or anti-sex-work, to suit your narrative.
It's anti-bullshit bud.
You're slow, or you're opinion is hypocritical. So your stalking me around because my opinion differs from yours, doesn't matter.. and the downvotes from your little echo-chamber pals don't matter either..
It's absolutely hilarious to me, you spent time to bother writing such bullshit to me simply because you want to defend access to porn and prove that point so desperately. The real world is outside, where I live. An absolute comedy, you telling me to touch grass.

Why does it come across as sexist? Which part is untrue? Tell me about the "economic realities on the ground", and the experience you've had that makes you an expert in this field.

Yeah one question. I said I was a bartender and waiter. I made about 20 maybe 30 grand gross probably a year with tips. It was a while ago, granted, but the cost of everything increased quite disproportionately to wages since then anyway and you seem like you're trying real hard to prove something.
So my questions is, what the fuck are you on about?

How much is one salary, to you?

You're not here for the, leopards ate my face, part of this are you?

The quotation marks surround the wrong word.

Sorry. The "money" part didn't actually factor in for me because I'm in Canada and it wasn't on my mind. Doesn't mean we don't pay for it through taxes I just mean it wasn't on my mind. I just meant greater severity should equal earlier service.

"Emergency" and "urgent" are different categories in hospitals.
And actually defined, at least in my local Canadian hospital.
Urgent Care is defined as infections, lacerations, wounds, less serious injuries, minor Pediatric illness, situational crisis support, Women's Health services, contraceptive management, etc. So stuff that "could" wait about a week if necessary. I find they can get to stuff much sooner, based on anything I've needed or reports from friends and family.

Because, logic.