novibe

Idk man I think there’s as many people like that as “anarchists” who live under bridges and dump dive.

It’s just that libs and left anti-communists usually see any type of real actual action and revolutionary practice as “evil”.

This comes from the unfortunate viral idea that communism has stages.

Some people get really attached to this idea, and either become super against it or super for it. Then they end up wanting to either fully concentrate on “lower stage communism” and idolize militaristic aesthetics of early communist revolutions, and the perceived “toughness” and “authoritarianism” they had. In the extreme this becomes shit like the ACP.

On the other hand, others completely forgo any large scale timeline thinking, and start fantasizing and theorizing about a possible quick jump to “stateless, classless, moneyless” society (which is in itself a misinterpretation of what communism is but that’s another thing completely) in a single revolutionary moment and process.

There are no stages, communism is not total anarchy either. Communism is the means and methods the working class uses to abolish itself. This should start with a revolution, and continue until it’s finished. This process likely would take many generations. And it would be one continuous revolution. This is communism, this state of affairs. Of the long revolution of self-abolishment of the working class.

What comes AFTER, is a stateless classless moneyless society. What is dissolved first and when depends on the revolution, but it wouldn’t all be at once, or it would. Who knows.

Idk man, if you are against all communist movements in history you’re an anti-communist to me 🤷‍♂️

That doesn’t happen though. What we saw were rightwing counterrevolutionaries taking over the USSR, China etc.

But historically it’s a great mischaracterization of all socialist revolutions to say they were “overtaken by authoritarians”.

All revolutions are “authoritarian”.

There’s a weird misunderstanding of what a “vanguard” is, in both left anti-communist and communist circles.

A vanguard is not a self-defined group that rules over the proles and directs them towards a revolution and governs once it’s won.

Vanguards are not things that exist in the present. Vanguard is just a term to help understand a revolution after it happens.

When a revolution happens, the most politically advanced (in class consciousness and left theory) individuals and groups that participate will steer the people towards socialism. They will lead, by example, on who to fight, how and why.

During the revolution, they aren’t called anything and specially not by themselves.

But after the revolution, when analyzing it, those people are then called the vanguard of the revolution.

Any communist that says they want to “form and participate in a vanguard party” has no understanding of revolutions and left theory.

Any left anti-communist that derides vanguards for being authoritarian and “replicating state oppression” also have no understanding of revolutions or left theory.

Honestly we would all be better off just not using the term vanguard at all anymore.

Wait the kangaroo is actually a commie in the movie..? What the hell 😂

We know that the Hungarian “popular revolt” was recently proven to be a CIA color revolution, right? Like CIA documents were released proving they instigated and supported the whole thing to destabilize the USSR, right?

Not that the USSR of that time was all that great, but why are we using Cold War anti-communist operations and propaganda for our arguments..?

My only real take here is basically every single libertarian eventually becomes a technofascist. Why is that? Idk. But it happens over and over again.