mathemachristian

joined 2 years ago
[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's listing all his fans again πŸ˜’

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, the US did. They're still considered at war since no peace treaty has been signed the US is officially still at war with them.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Ok, and that makes them more, less or the same amount of deserving of getting the wall?

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But they don't literally want to suck dick do they? The whole "they want to gargle hitlers ball" is just a euphemism for them allegedly wanting to be able to submit and get owned completely by someone higher up. I'm not judging nazis for wanting to suck dick, I'm judging liberals for using dicksucking as a euphemism for deplorable, sycophantic behavior.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Characterising gay men who like to suck dick as "submissive" is harmful. And therefore homophobic. Fellating someone is not being submissive, getting fellated is not dominating. It can be, in a dom/sub context, but it is not in itself an act with a dom/sub dynamic and characterizing it as such leads to people seeing gay people as more submissive, effeminate, and, in a patriarchal society, therefore as lesser. This whole "the person getting penetrated is the submissive part" as if they're "letting it happen" or are doing it for the benefit of the other party needs to die out. It's sexist and homophobic. I don't need to dominate my partner when having sex with her, nor do I need to submit or be passive or whatever when fellating her.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What then baffles me is why this is used by the anti-fascists? Why is it not just taken at face value, but the whole idea of a person getting their mouth stuffed is treated as ick and can only be because the "dominating" person has him do this.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Then why the need to insert gay sex into it? The whole "Trump sucks off Putin", "The billionaires suck off Trump", like whats the punchline here? "Lol its like they're being gay with eachother"? "Ewww he's letting himself get used like some gay"?

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Calling someone a

slurcocks*cker
is widely accepted as a homophobic slur, and imo is rather obviously the root of the idea that a person sucking cock is "allowing themself to be used by a dominant figure" as you so neatly put it. The whole idea that the person getting their cock sucked is dominating the person sucking their cock is homophobic. It treats the person sucking cock as lesser. It's how you got the societal taboo of giving a woman oral sex, which admittedly is almost unheard of nowadays, but it used to be that going down on a woman was seeing as feminizing (since you're getting dominated by a woman) and therefore gay.

Asskissing has a completely different origin going back to a poem by GΓΆtz von Berlichingen. It comes from a completely different context even though they both are used as largely replaceable idioms.

I should come up with a copy-pasteable answer at some point.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Idk where you got it from but Im not gonna give the libs on here the benefit of the doubt that they will read this and think its an epic own that calls fascists slur

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It WaSnT hOmOpHoBiC iT wAs MiSoGyNiStIc

every. fucking. time.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (20 children)

Why the constant gay-shaming of fascists?? Is being a fascist thats secretly gay somehow worse than being a cishet fascist?

Edit: what about openly gay fascists?

view more: next β€Ί