Maybe the focus should be on a free (government funded, ideally FOSS) parental controls software suite that makes blocking social media on all major platforms (iOS, Android, Windows, Mac, and Linux) simple and easy.
They already come built in every major OS. Parents only need to enable it. I'm stunned no one's pointed this out.
This failure is entirely on the parents.
That's like your dumb opinion, man. Freedom > pathetic dumbasses who drag everyone down by expecting everyone else to parent their kids. Morally, this is their problem, and the entitlement is unreal to pretend it isn't. The most innovative societies respect freedom & expect people be accountable for their choices. The planet is better off with fewer people.
And if they can remove that, they can remove anything.
That's why there's no limit on the number of relays (events usually publish to multiple) or subscriptions to them (clients usually subscribe to multiple).
unpleasant time here if you loath all moderation
Still off topic, and the moderators here aren't reddit moderator scum so far. The modlog offers decent transparency.
Why is that better?
User control & flexibility > illegitimate authority. Also, I remember an earlier, untamed, unrulier, more subversive internet than this corporate-friendly crap: it was funner.
any community anywhere online still needs to remove CSAM and gore and other things.
Legal compliance is different from legally unnecessary moderation.
Because a hashtag under a no-moderation concept could still be hijacked.
Not really: Nostr content is cryptographically signed. User's client subscribes to some content curators who post as signed events their tags for other events. The client processes these tagging events to filter according to the user's preferences.
Some proposals already exist:
the fediverse will never be what you want it to be
Not the topic of discussion, which is function & protocol.
Yup, better. Moderation should be opt-in & is better handled at the client: the user could opt-in to a "moderation community" that publishes tags their client would follow. Such curation for anyone who wants that is a better idea. Far better than moderators we don't get to choose.
I like Nostr over ActivityPub: simpler, more elegant protocol, decentralized, public key signatures, resistance to censorship, anti-moderation.
Content curation is voluntary & left to the client, giving the user greater control/flexibility & preventing moderator tyranny.
I'm astonished at the way you broke markdown to degrade accessibility. Special type of evil or inebriation?
So there are no moderation tools / whitelist/blacklists?
This is a good thing: bitchasses need to learn words are harmless & they can ignore them like humanity has done for millennia. It's not built into the servers. Client-side tooling would handle it, so it's entirely at the discretion of the user, which seems better to me.
What's with not reading? Formatting looks correct from your instance on the web, so 🤷. Could you be more vague?
Needs text alternative (inaccessible content is right wing).
figurehead monarch
actual dictator
same thing! 😊
I think they're worthless mollycoddling & signs of a stunted mind.
by their parents
Legal processes for unfit parents already exist. Are you willfully ignorant for the sake of it?
If typical Australians are like this, then no wonder New Zealand ridicules them.