dbtng

joined 9 months ago
[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the more of youtube we import ... the more of youtube we import. Part of the reason we aren't flooded with crap on the fediverse is that we are too small to matter. And perhaps we are small enough to effectively police our own. So ... why would we want to import youtube at all? Bigger is not better.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

That's a link. They also call them URLs. We learned about them in web class, back in the stone age.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Damn. It took me 3 paragraphs to say that. Good job.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, I quibble with much of what you just wrote, but your first line contained a lucid point.

In essence, you propose that a federated monetization scheme would direct the bulk of the pie to the participants and not to the big corporate interests.

Now that's a damned interesting thing to consider.
I think its obvious that it would/will go awry. Any time you get non-profits screwing around with money, somebody figures out how to steal it.
But if even a bit more went to the participants and paid for infrastructure, that would be a positive thing.

But again ... non-profits and coops never handle money correctly. Watch this get all the way to the goalpost and then swoop, it all gets handled with GooglePay. Its doomed. DOOM.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Youtube was a lot more fun before it was flooded with professionals out to make a buck on advertising. This thing you seek ... it is not good.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Ok. I can follow this line of reasoning.
If you want to avoid corporate platforms, fediverse doesn't provide as viable an alternative as one might like.
This is clear, and makes sense. Thanks for the succinct explanation. At least I see some sense here now.

I'm not entirely sure that it matters.
Like, when was it decided that the 'making money' bit needed to be imported from YouTube?

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 13 points 2 weeks ago (22 children)

Hey, um .... I read your article. Or I tried to.
It lost me at the point where I need to give money to somebody else. So, basically right at the start.

To be more specific, your article starts of lamenting that its not convenient enough for me to give money to someone ("content creators", a bullshit term if I've ever heard one) on these federated platforms. "this is a bit of a problem" There's no examination of whether we should be doing this. Its taken as a given that monetization is a positive goal.

So ... I really tried to get there and understand your point, but there's this vast gulf between us.
Why would it be bad if nobody makes any money off the fediverse?
That sounds good to me.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Munchie did not like other cats. Not even TV cats. Notice the strike marks on the screen ...

I miss my kitty. Thanks for bringing her back to me for a sec.