I'll be making an effortpost on my blog soon-ish about it, before promptly losing interest in it forever.
Dude, what? Are you sure you're in the right instance? Purges? Fuck outta here
Ugh. Well, good luck if you try to engage in such a bad-faith space.
I found subtitles for it iirc
You sound cool and seem to have enough patience to counter ML-propaganda. Hope you stick around :)
You just made an enemy, for life!
Disengage. FFS! Take a hint.
Kropotkin and Lucy Parsons would disagree
Stop bringing up your pet anarchists. We're not reliant on the words of "Great people" like Marxists are. Even Stalin and Trotsky couldn't even fucking agree like that and they were using the words of Lenin directly. Give it a rest.
Not gonna enable your debate-perverty, mate. You clearly can't (or won't) tell when people are not in the mood to engage with you and are likely just seeing it as an opportunity to propagandize the audience for ML.
Given that anarchists consider USSR and PRC and the rest as merely forms of State Capitalism, the red fash description is very much apt, even if one accepts the ML definition of fascism (which we don't have to).
Yes, you keep saying your piece. Sorry not sorry that I keep calling the fash, fash.
As is tradition. Although it was partially recycled.
We're not against marxism in general, but more against the red fash versions of it. I'll leave the comm owner to elaborate why they felt this instance was the right fit for this comm. I'm also not going to make a "left-unity" comm just to allow dictator-stans unchallenged propaganda platforms.
Cross-posted from "Audhd" by @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com in !ausomememes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Cross-posted from "Audhd" by @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip in !autismmemes@lemmy.zip
Cross-posted from "Many times" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Cross-posted from "Do you agree?" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !autism@lemmy.world
Cross-posted from "You are all lost!" by @Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net in !movies@hexbear.net
Hey peeps, the well-known spam problem in lemmy DMs is getting slightly worse, and the spammer in question is evolving their tactics to evade the very rudimentary options we have built-in to lemmy itself (or should I just call it,non-existent?). To get ahead of this, we deployed a DM-scanner directly in the DB, based off of this code but adjusted so that it's more difficult to pull off shenanigans.
At the moment we're only deleting messages based on the "fediverse chick" spam. However I want to point out that if for some reason you legitimately DM someone on dbzer0 with similar terms, you DM might get deleted, so do be aware about that. Them's the breaks.
Unfortunately I can't reveal the exact code I'm using atm, as this can lead to the spammer adjusting their tactics to evade it. However I plan to adjust threativore to also be able to manage your DB anti-DM-spam filters in the future, to make it much easier to handle this, even if you don't feel confident touching your DB. Stay tuned.
I do hope we get more robust anti-spam tech in lemmy and I did open two issues about this, but it seems this is not a prio atm.
If you realize that the anti-spam ate a DM. Do let us know. If you see spam getting through, also let us know.
view more: next ›
I improved one of my boardgames with 48 unique 3d printed spaceship designs