Nobody said that, nice try fishing for strawmen though LMAO
Your submission in "Protect your mental health from capitalistic thought as much as possible" was removed since it's not a meme.
Just wanted to say: keep up the goated work, like in this thread in general
Then I'm glad you got spared the headaches
It's pretty obviously social imperialism and not relations on equal footing IMO
Also just an FYI that the non-revisionist internationalist socialist position is one of not supporting either side in an inter-imperialist war (read: a conventional one between two capitalist governments, not an anti-colonial one e.g.) and if viable go for revolutionary defeatism in ones home country
Every proper socialist hates bourgeois "democracies" lmao
Any leftist and every sane person says "Amerikkka bad"
It's the worst thing to happen to humanity in the second half of the 20th century and beyond
That is by far not a universal definition anymore and not at all how it is used on the internet by a lot of people ๐
E.g.: Liberals often use it to refer to anyone revolutionary, from anarchists to Maoists...
It's a loaded and really unclear term nowadays and could even be interpreted as whistleblowing
Edit: Hence my question, because this could have been a rule 1 deletion and/or a temp ban e.g.
I am referring to the Maoist concept of social imperialism of the USSR, which I tend to agree with.
I am not talking about capitalist financial imperialism, this allegation being well refuted by Castro:
Edit: Castro's refutation is also a great explanation, of why I would classify today's PRC as regularly imperialist, even if not to the degree of the USA/EU etc.