TalkingFlower

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It would be a Gish gallop if they do some brigading; that's how they usually scare off OP. Since he did not know he was making a controversial statement, and did not pre-emptively stop the Gish Gallop.

[–] TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ad nauseum

Thanks, this is an exact description.

[–] TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately, it is a split issue, so both sides get some support.

 

When someone repeats an argument that has been proven false /badly argued many times before, but keeps repeating it in hopes of drowning out opposition or derailing a thread. Yet not disruptive enough to get banned on forums, as it wraps itself in non-hostile, nicely written sentences.

How exactly do moderators deal with this kind of behaviour?