I don't think they serve any other purpose than to signal that the person wishes to come across as considerate.
If it's gore, porn or such then yeah but if we're speaking of just text then no.
Perspectivist
joined 5 months ago
I genuinely don't know. I only know what makes me momentarily forget about the lack of happines but I don't think that's the same thing.
In this particular case I'm okay with it but I don't see it as stealing. Human artists are influenced by the art of other artists the same way. It's only stealing if you're selling copies of the original piece as your own. I wouldn't have any problem with someone copying my entire photography portfolio to train an AI to generate pictures with my style because it takes nothing away from me. Just sell them as your own then instead of claiming they were taken by me.
I hope you didn't bet much. Just goes to show how one shouldn't make assumptions based on tiny bits of unrelated information.
Where do you draw the line on what counts as property? Surely people can have some things that are theirs?
I didn't - I created it.
I'm a self-employed home improvement contractor. I got laid off from my previous job as a plumber and I didn't want to just find a different company to do the same thing for, so I instead took this decade-long vision of a better alternative and turned it into a business.
In my personal case, especially among the people I hang with here, my positive attitude toward generative AI seems like one of the major ones. Many people really don't seem to like it when someone mentions enjoying using these tools.
TWD zombies ofcourse.
Andrew Camarata
I bet this guy gets sponsorship offer after another and he refuses all of them. He has multiple videos in progress all the time. Some take years to finish. He might do a job and then at the end of the video he revisits the site half year later or for example waits for a rainy day to shoot video of how the new drainage ditch works. I challenge anyone to find a more authetic YouTuber.