Pamasich

joined 2 years ago
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 2 points 10 hours ago

Switzerland has Fedlex. For example here's the constitution.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 3 points 10 hours ago

I didn't. My country focuses more on apprenticeships than higher education, and I wasn't the type to be really ambitious. So I never really explored my options and just went with the flow.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 points 23 hours ago

Not using Lemmy myself, but I assume this is about the name in the url vs the name in the UI. Displayname is probably how Lemmy itself displays the community, but name is what's in the URL and in the fediverse handle.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago

What if there were a way to do this with multiple fediverse services? What if you have an article, and the comments are 1 lemmy user, 1 mastodon user, 1 misskey user, 1 friendica user, ect ect ect? Basically start making ANY fediverse service a viable way to leave a comment, which can be replied to by any other fediverse user, regardless of service?

That's just the base promise of ActivityPub, the basis of the fediverse. It's not a hypothetical, but rather reality.

That scenario you mentioned, it's not only Lemmy users that could reply there. All the ones you mentioned would have had access to that blog's comment section and been able to leave replies.

So if you have user@lemmy.world, and you go to his community, you see a thread, you comment.....your comment is now in the comments section of his blog.

That's just literally the same as me looking at this Lemmy thread from Mbin, leaving a comment, and it appearing on Lemmy.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not on Lemmy, but I have the "Active" sort set as my default.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not sure if you're already aware, but that relative link there is broken in Lemmy, Mbin, and Piefed.

If you used it manually, I'd suggest not using relative links in posts targeted at users from software that hasn't implemented them yet.

If it's some automated feature, I don't think it should be in the source property of the federated JSON in the first place.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

Once upon a long time ago, some old man gave a monkey an apple and then love happened and they leveled up into humans. May have been 100 or 200 or more years ago I don't do historian.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

There are others, yeah. But they're not threadiverse. They're quite different types of social media from Lemmy. Since OP is using Lemmy, that's why I'm recommending Mbin, not one of those.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Like I said, if you want more integration than what Lemmy offers, do consider switching to Mbin instead. It targets both, the threadiverse and the microblogging side of the fediverse.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All that's needed is the reminder (as visible as possible) that content you are looking at is incomplete and you can find the more complete version on this or that URL or app.

That's what Mbin does, it displays a banner on federated user profiles explaining that they may be incomplete, with a link to the same profile on the originating instance.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

NOSTR is not any more a protocol of the fediverse than ATProto and Matrix's protocol are.

This is the first time I've seen anyone consider it as being part of the fediverse. Are there even any federated platforms that federate with it? If we can't talk to it, how is it federated with us?

view more: next ›