KelvarCherry

I really like this idea on its own. Multiple public options providers for multiple different products. Water/Electricity should be government run imo; but for Food? Household items? I'd love to see a multitude of government-stamped collectives that we could support. Actually... this was exactly what President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was attempting with his National Recovery Administration.

This is what I value most about UBI -- the leverage on workers; the flexibility to take time to rest and explore other, more fulfilling careers.

UBI is great, but First there's gotta be separate publicly-funded social nets for essentials like food, housing, water, electricity, heating...

Giving everyone $5000/mo to buy everything you want and need is far too volatile, and with poor budgeting people will end up trapped in debt spirals, needing microfinance loans to survive. I'd rather the government give $1000/mo to buy everything you want, then having public services to provide food, rent, and other necessities.

I fear that giving free-range UBI on its own will spawn a bunch of extreme examples that get disseminated en-masse by reactionary outlets to breed resentment of UBI and "handouts" in the eyes of the people. You'll have folks who are physically and/or mentally ill, who spend the whole allowance on drugs or gambling or porn or other controversial expenditures; then have to turn to charity to survive until their next UBI check. I'd need to know people would have that stable base before I'd feel comfortable with them being thrown that rope.

This is coming from seeing decades of USA arguments against welfare, then watching the "For The Children" fearmongering against the open internet. I just don't want a few extreme examples to have us all strung up.

Sometimes I'll pop open Mega Man 1 when my blood pressure is too high to focus on anything. I plan to no-hit it one day (without major glitches)

Nope and I'm not applying it to "white citizens"; just "conservatives". I'm saying to the "white lib"s and others that the violence is already here.

I take this meme to also point out that a fascist could just not follow elections, or call them off entirely. Adolf Hitler, the man in the image, called of elections under guise of security. Yeah, you vote against 'em, but then they refuse to leave.

"BannedVoice" pointed out that this didn't happen in 2020, but I'd point out that then Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, as well as a fair number of Republican politicians, were what you'd call "Tea Party" or neoconservative. Kevin McCarthy, as well as just about every one of these "moderate" Republicans, have been chased out of the party, largely because of their refusal to bow to MAGA orders. The Republican Party of 2020 is not the Republican Party we have now. It's loyalists all the way through. Remember what happened with the Epstein files?

except for all the white conservatives that stormed the Capitol on Jan 6th, 2021; commit acts of violence against Democrat politicians; make reports and call "wellness checks" on others; commit or support police brutality; defend ICE abductions and trafficking...

*watch my bitch wife with TV

it's the faces, the character shapes, but really that yellow hue across the image. Perhaps someone with some color theory knowledge could explain why ChatGPT generates images like that.