Iceblade02

joined 2 years ago
[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Eesh, that sounds obnoxious

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In that the primary function of the bells (at least where I live) is the telling of time, not religious broadcasting. There is no inherent message in the chiming of the clocks. In general, the bells chime every full hour during during daytime, and clock towers aren't necessarily exclusive to churches either.

There is certainly an argument to be made however that they should be removed due to being redundant, intrusive and outdated.

If I had a choice between both being allowed and both prohibited, the choice would be prohibiting both, always. It's a question of freedom from religion - we shouldn't have to live with religious propaganda being blasted into our homes.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Whilst I agree in principle (since hereditary monarchies are inherently anti-meritocratic), there is actually a strong argument for constitutional and apolitical figurehead monarchs (i.e mostly powerless). They serve as something of an antidote to cults of personality and can also act as a uniting force in times of crisis.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Rule 1: be decent

Rule 2: follow rule 1