.world users complaining about .ml on a .ml community
HiddenLayer555
joined 1 year ago
Mostly paraphrased, I don't remember exactly how it was worded. Also the non-quote responses were made up after the fact for this post, this wasn't a single conversation in this order:
"You'll miss out on so many events and social opportunities because you don't have any 'real' social media."
As an introvert, I don't care.
"You're selfish for putting your silly notions of 'privacy' over being in the loop with what your friends are doing. One day you'll realize that being there when your friends post about their life events is more important."
Said by someone who I never considered my friend in the first place. My actual friends have ways of reaching me other than Facebook or WhatsApp.
"Most people aren't going to bother figuring out which obsecure 'privacy oriented' service you decide to use, they're just not going to talk to you if you're not on mainstream apps. Normal people value their time more than they value privacy."
Please stop talking to me then, so I stop wasting your time.
"This isn't the 1950s anymore. You need to get with the times and embrace the information age."
I know how to program, you don't. I know how the protocols that power the internet work, you think it's a literal magic cloud. I run my own server at home with hardware I bought, you have to pay for Google Drive every month. I'm the one embracing the information age, you're just blindly using it.
"Geez, you're like an Amish person! Don't you see you've fallen into a cult? Just instead of not using electricity you don't use social media."
No I'm not. See above, I fully embrace technology. In fact, I embrace it so much I've spent most of my life figuring out how it works and only use things I understand and control, and I choose not to use certain conveniences because I know how they work. Also, I'm not an antivaxxer or against modern medicine. I also think raising horses in captivity to be your slave is cruel and barbaric. Finally, I don't believe in God and don't try to live my life according to a 2000+ year old book. Privacy isn't a cult, if anything, your blind faith in trillion dollar tech companies is more like the Amish's blind faith to their God.
Is opnsense more secure?
The goal is to debunk verifiable lies fed to you by the West. The post makes no mention of how good or evil they were, only that they definitely did not say these very specific evil things. If it happens to cause you to reconsider your conclusion that these people are evil, a conclusion also fed to you by the same Western propaganda, that's your business.
Thank you!
Wouldn't the old firmware still have to respond to and perform the flashing request? For example reading from a USB drive? Is it more likely to overwrite potentially malicious code compared to the reset button or automatic updates from the web admin panel?
Run my own server at home to store my files.
As I mature, I find myself thinking very lowly of standup in general despite watching a lot of it when I was an edgy 18/19 year old. When I try to get back into it now I just see the various ethical problems with their jokes and that makes it not funny for me.
White standup comics get free reign to drop racist dog whistles and if you criticize them on it they get all snippy with you. The most popular "genre" of white stand up comedy still seems to be "I went to a [insert culture here] restaurant and here are my disrespectful and stereotype enforcing hijinks" or even "I went to [insert COUNTRY here] and will now proceed to joke about how their culture is different from us." I can only hope the whole thing is made up and they're not that atrocious in real life, though the vast majority of service staff seem to have stories about famous comics treating them like shit so I wouldn't be surprised.
Even a lot of ethnic standup comics portray themselves as the victims of racism in one joke but then have no problems using stereotypes of another ethnicity in the very next joke.
Also standup definitely seems to have an air of being attended by older generations who find insulting the younger generations funny. Things like participation trophies (which was a boomer idea by the way, the kids aren't planning school competitions or buying the prizes) or terms like "snowflake" seems to have gotten into boomer rethoric partly because of standup. Reactionary takes about progressive social movements like veganism or car-free living are also the norm because I assume they know most of the people who watch them are the type to get mad at how other people choose to live their lives. Standup in general seems to have a "let's make fun of anything people are doing that's different from how it was before because we don't want to do it that way and need validation that we're not assholes on the wrong side of history" attitude. Or they'll just make fun of random people living their lives, I remember watching a comic on YouTube doing a whole segment making fun of people who swim laps in hotel pools because it annoys him, like bro mind your own damn business.
Occasionally a comic will try to earn brownie points by saying the most superficial shit about a major societal problem and then act like they singlehandedly solved it. Bonus points if they're talking about another country's problems which the West fucking caused.
I'm not saying all standup is like this or all standup comics are racist or reactionary, but I am saying there are very few long running standup shows/podcasts with none of these problems.
Who cares how nihilistic I am? I'll be dead eventually and so will you.
Define "doing things which enable you to survive." In my definition, that doesn't involve being king or exploiting others to hoard more wealth than you could ever hope to spend. You need some minimum amount of resources to survive but hoarding many times more than you need doesn't help you survive and only harms others.
"If a monkey hoards more bananas than it can eat, causing its peers to starve while most of the bananas rot in its pile, scientists will study its brain to find out what the hell is wrong with it. But when a human does it, they get celebrated under capitalism."
Also, it was once human nature to flee from fire, but once we learned to control it, it became an integral part of our lives. Human "nature" changes over time because your brain is pretty much a blank slate when you're born and doesn't fully finish structuring itself until your 20s. Your entire childhood is spent developing your "nature" that you'll have for your adult life (and even then you can change it at will even in adulthood if you change your living conditions), which is why we're more influenced by the conditions we grow up in than any sort of innate biology. What "nature" was best for hunter gatherer or even medieval times are totally obsolete in our modern day, so they stop being our default "nature" due to children no longer growing up in those conditions.
The idea that your nature is influenced by your conditions isn't even unique to humans. Most animals are the same, a house cat or dog will learn from a very young age how to beg for food from their owners while a feral cat/dog won't because that's not beneficial for their survival when they're not a pet. Hell, house cats keep making kitten sounds because their owners keep treating them like kittens, while feral cats stop meowing once they leave their parents. Animals born and raised in captivity in general often show completely different behaviors and personality compared to wild animals of the same species, because their brains are literally structured differently due to growing up in different conditions.
Yes. Because it benefited them over others. Humans are capable of choosing to do things that benefit them and it has nothing to do with their "nature". Human nature is to not die and in the ages when humans could barely produce enough food for their own survival, it was beneficial to be in a position of power because it let you control the resources, ensuring you had enough for yourself and maybe some of your subjects as an afterthought. Marxism does not reject the notion that power benefits the people who have then, in fact that's a core fact that Marxism is based on, and it calls out the fact that feudal/monarchist/capitalist power benefits the ruling class by subjugating and exploiting the working class, and proposes that fully collective control of resources will benefit everyone much more equally than the current system. I don't think you have to agree with Marxism's proposed solution to this to recognize the problem it points out. It asserts that because we have lived in such systems our whole lives, we think it's human nature when in reality a person born and living in some other system (Marxist or otherwise) will think their system is human nature, because in reality no system is and they're all abstract inventions with nothing to do with our neurobiology or evolution.
For a non political example, I write code all day because it benefits me and I think it's the most normal and intuitive thing ever, even though I doubt programming was something humans evolved to do, we figured it out ourselves and it had nothing to do with our nature. You literally have to learn and practice abstract computational thinking while learning to program because it's very unintuitive at times compared to how humans think by default, yet people learn it just fine and once you do, it becomes your nature.
The cool thing about humans is we're not bound to natural instincts and can choose to live however we want. I think we should leverage this ability instead of using it as a justification for maintaining the same broken systems that have let us down over and over again.
As in the German bourgeoisie.
Make no mistake, German "firms" are not and never will be China's "friends." They're not even Germany's friends. This is just a further extension of the West's outsourcing of labour to China, a decidedly one sided relationship where any benefit to China is a happy accident at best and a terrible side effect at worst in the eyes of German businesspeople.