Goodeye8

joined 6 months ago
[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 31 points 1 week ago

And never did I argue the opposite. The question was: supposing Ukrainians wish to concede territory, would you still support them?

If you never argued the opposite what's the point of you question? Or do you just like to ask about unfounded hypotheticals?

Potentially, but given your own source, a solid portion of Ukrainians dont share those warm and fuzzies.

Am I supposed to believe you purely coincidentally happened upon the lowest trust poll? How about we look at the latest data of the same poll. Turns out a big majority of Ukrainians do trust Zelenskyy.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 52 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't think anyone is questioning whether Ukrainians want the war to end. Of course the majority want the war to end as soon as possible. However, when asked specifically about territorial concessions the majority of Ukrainians are not willing to accept concessions. Source.

Maybe the Ukrainian leadership knows more about what the average Ukrainian wants than you do?

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Nothing spicy happens, Norris wins the WDC by finishing in the top three.

Alright, I'll throw in my spicy take as well. McLaren mess up Norris's pitstop letting Russell into third. Russell then let's Norris pass when Norris gets close enough to Russell, coming back to the previous Norris in top three winning the WDC prediction.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

I don't think it would've mattered. Russell is the kind of guy to let Norris pass just to spite Max. I would be surprised if towards the end of the race we get Verstappen Piastri Russell Norris and Russell let's Lando by.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Hope he didn't smash his TV like he does the steering wheel.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well that's kinda disappointing. Hadjar definitely deserves the RBR seat, he's clearly fast, but I hoped it would happen in 2027. I don't think Hadjar has the experience to give constructive feedback to the 2026 car which means we'll most likely be back to a car only Max can drive.

On a side note, I'm amazed they kept Lawson. I guess he'll be on the chopping block next year if Lindblad beats him as easily as Hadjar has beaten him.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The whole train of thought is just brainrot. Even if we somehow believe that Merc wants to screw RBR over so badly that they're willing to risk their 2nd place at the constructors, how do they communicate that to Antonelli without the rest of us knowing about it? It's not like Antonelli has some vibrator up his ass to get morse code from the pitwall. That would have to be discussed and decided before the race that if by some miracle the merc drivers somehow end up ahead of the McLaren they should just let McLaren pass so they could screw with Max?

I don't know what those people are smoking but they should put the pipe down.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This just solidifies my belief that Mclaren doesn't have two number 1 drivers, they have two number 2 drivers. They could've had the WDC in the bag by now and instead it gets down to the last race. It's still Norris's championship to lose but if he hadn't passed Antonelli then Max winning the WDC would've been a near guarantee. It shouldn't have been this close to begin with, but because McLaren refuses to have a number 1 driver we're going to the last race with only a small advantage for Norris to win. If I was Oscar Piastri I would be looking at what other teams can offer because Mclaren is only cares about the WCC. He deserves better.

The rest of the race kinda meh IMO. I don't know how Sainz got to P3 but definitely a good job.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's just good old brainwashing. They believe that voting for democrats will ruin their life so they vote for republicans and if republicans ruin their life then it's bad luck.