Sarcasm doesn't need to decieve, it needs to make a point IMO.
Cowbee
Enough that the other party can understand.
I do, generally, but I also know that people may not get it not through lack of intelligence, but through neurodivergence. At the bare minimum, if someone asks for clarification it should be given.
I really think sarcasm needs to be properly marked in text formats.
Hangol is very easy to learn, you can learn it in a day if you wanted to. Grammar and vocab take much, much longer though.
Historically vanguards only ever derive any form of power or legitimacy through popular support from the broader working classes. Had vanguards not been popularly supported, they would have failed. You can see examples of supposed "vanguards" that do fail, such as the Gonzaloist CPP Shining Path, which slaughtered peasants and alienated themselves from the working classes.
Sources like the BBC, New York Times, The Guardian, The Hill, Jacobin, Reuters, The Natiob, and Al Jazeera are "paid by the Kremlin?" I know fascists like you thrive on irrationality, but there's a limit to denying reality.
From davel's compilation:
- BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict
- Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians
- The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda
- The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video
- WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know
- Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem
- The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
- openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences
- Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War
- Consortium News, 2022: Evidence of US-Backed Coup in Kiev
- Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties?
- History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV
Ukraine ethnically cleansing the Donbass region, which popularly supports Russia, is what started the war. The Euromaidan coup is what kicked off the war in 2014, Russia entered in 2022 after the Minsk agreements failed. Had NATO not couped Ukraine, the war would have never happened.
I understand you perfectly well, you're an open book. You're an anti-communist, homophobic, racist Euronationalist, ie a fascist. It's pretty clear-cut. Nationalism in the global north perpetuates imperialism, fascism is anti-communist, you think people in the global south are ethnically inferior and you tell queer people that they need to not be offended by your homophobia. There's no possibility you could be anything other than far-right, be it socially or economically.
Nah, you got banned for good reason, you're an incredibly racist, homophobic, far-right Euronationalist. Your attitude towards the global south is straight out of the colonial era.
I gave western sources that are biased against Russia and pro-Kiev still admitting to the ethnic cleansing campaign. Secondly, war in Ukraine is unpopular! They have to rely on forced conscription to keep the war going. There's a decent amount of nationalists in Ukraine that support the Banderites just like there are a decent number of MAGA supporters outside of the government in the US Empire, but by and large the war is unpopular. That's also why Kiev is finally trying to concede and reach a peace deal.
You've got this thought terminating ideology where if something disagrees with your far-right narrative, you immediately disagree with it, even if the sources are from outlets that share your world view.
It's less that and more that as capitalism turns to imperialism, it outsources all it can while trying to maintain a tech monopoly, creating "high value add" industry. The problem is that this "value add" industry doesn't actually add any more value than other kinds of industry, its just kept as a tech monopoly, but China's been able to break into that tech monopoly and fight those monopolist prices.
There's a pretty big difference between literature and art, and online comments.