this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
40 points (81.2% liked)

World News

51321 readers
1465 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/31427438

Beijing is pouring vast resources into fusion research, while the U.S. wants private industry to lead the way. The winner could reshape civilization.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not if the US has anything to say about it. And by that I mean doubling down on fossil fuels and making a total ass of itself.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

Everyone gets a lump of toxic Coal!

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know, the us already has access to fusion energy - but for some reason utilities don't like people having access to solar

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, most places don't have unlimited sun in the day let alone at night. Perhaps a tower like structure that exists above the stratosphere might get a 100 percent solar input, so that we would be able to harness the power of the sun, in the palm of our hands.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't necessarily need full sun any more (though it helps). Solar panels are a lot better than they used to be at generating power on cloudy, overcast days. You can even use them in the North of Britain these days. Of course they generate more on both of our sunny days, but they still work on our normal rainy cloudy days too.

I remember reading about some plan to fill the Sahara desert with solar panels, which would in theory be able to power the whole world, but I imagine there's a whole lot of politics, profit and greed in the way of something like that ever working (I imagine there's also a tonne of engineering and environmental considerations).

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

transmission losses are my biggest concern tbh

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Like the Australia - Asia solar project?

[–] mrmule@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Will it be boiling water again?

[–] VivianRixia@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

can you imagine how much water you can boil with your own tiny sun? we are going to be boiling so much water.

[–] mrmule@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

You won't be disappointed when you boil so much water

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fusion feels like one of those things that's been "a couple of decades away" since like the 1960s.

Even if it works, would it ever be cheaper or massively more useful than nationwide wind turbine networks, tidal power and fields full of solar panels?

Could be important if we want to leave the solar system at some point, and it would be nice to make it actually work, but I'm not seeing the big advantage over everything else.

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Wind and solar is not a constant controllable source. Theoretically, fusion would allow for a very consistent and large base load. Tidal power so far has had lots of issues afaik. Turns out it's really hard to make reliable generators that are in constant contact with salt water. Don't get me wrong, all of those other sources are going to be extremely important, but fusion will absolutely be worthwhile if we can actually get it running.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

This kind of investment gives me hope that fusion may one day be economically feasible.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

China is also burning more coal than ever before. Don't fall for the greenwashing.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

How will we monetize it?!