this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
40 points (81.2% liked)

World News

51315 readers
2007 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/31427438

Beijing is pouring vast resources into fusion research, while the U.S. wants private industry to lead the way. The winner could reshape civilization.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know, the us already has access to fusion energy - but for some reason utilities don't like people having access to solar

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, most places don't have unlimited sun in the day let alone at night. Perhaps a tower like structure that exists above the stratosphere might get a 100 percent solar input, so that we would be able to harness the power of the sun, in the palm of our hands.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't necessarily need full sun any more (though it helps). Solar panels are a lot better than they used to be at generating power on cloudy, overcast days. You can even use them in the North of Britain these days. Of course they generate more on both of our sunny days, but they still work on our normal rainy cloudy days too.

I remember reading about some plan to fill the Sahara desert with solar panels, which would in theory be able to power the whole world, but I imagine there's a whole lot of politics, profit and greed in the way of something like that ever working (I imagine there's also a tonne of engineering and environmental considerations).

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

transmission losses are my biggest concern tbh

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Like the Australia - Asia solar project?