this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
505 points (99.0% liked)

World News

51321 readers
1315 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Australia has enacted a world-first ban on social media for users aged under 16, causing millions of children and teenagers to lose access to their accounts.

Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, YouTube, Snapchat, Reddit, Kick, Twitch and TikTok are expected to have taken steps from Wednesday to remove accounts held by users under 16 years of age in Australia, and prevent those teens from registering new accounts.

Platforms that do not comply risk fines of up to $49.5m.

There have been some teething problems with the ban’s implementation. Guardian Australia has received several reports of those under 16 passing the facial age assurance tests, but the government has flagged it is not expecting the ban will be perfect from day one.

All listed platforms apart from X had confirmed by Tuesday they would comply with the ban. The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, said it had recently had a conversation with X about how it would comply, but the company had not communicated its policy to users.

Bluesky, an X alternative, announced on Tuesday it would also ban under-16s, despite eSafety assessing the platform as “low risk” due to its small user base of 50,000 in Australia.

Parents of children affected by the ban shared a spectrum of views on the policy. One parent told the Guardian their 15-year-old daughter was “very distressed” because “all her 14 to 15-year-old friends have been age verified as 18 by Snapchat”. Since she had been identified as under 16, they feared “her friends will keep using Snapchat to talk and organise social events and she will be left out”.

Others said the ban “can’t come quickly enough”. One parent said their daughter was “completely addicted” to social media and the ban “provides us with a support framework to keep her off these platforms”.

“The fact that teenagers occasionally find a way to have a drink doesn’t diminish the value of having a clear, ­national standard.”

Polling has consistently shown that two-thirds of voters support raising the minimum age for social media to 16. The opposition, including leader Sussan Ley, have recently voiced alarm about the ban, despite waving the legislation through parliament and the former Liberal leader Peter Dutton championing it.

The ban has garnered worldwide attention, with several nations indicating they will adopt a ban of their own, including Malaysia, Denmark and Norway. The European Union passed a resolution to adopt similar restrictions, while a spokesperson for the British government told Reuters it was “closely monitoring Australia’s approach to age restrictions”.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Props to Australia for creating a generation of kids with above average tech skills.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Fuck this Helen Lovejoy-arse shithole country. I wonder how many abused youth, marginalised teens and kids who made the mistake of being born to parents living in remote areas just lost access to their support networks. I wonder how many people are gonna have their identities stolen because of data breaches containing either documents or biometrics necessary to enforce this.
And for what? So boomer politicians and their constituents aren't challenged by their well-informed children about the genocides they're facilitating at home and abroad? So the pigs in this police state have an even easier time surveiling citizens with all the identifying info websites are gathering??

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, I am 100% pro-freedom of access and speech and all, but tbf anything that super murders social media is a net positive to the world at this point, until it's less harmful and addictive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is going to be a shit show.

I'm not opposed to the idea that kids shouldn't have access to social media, but they obviously do. Their social lives are online, and their insecure little brains are going to scream that they've been kicked out of the tribe when you cut the link

The ban won't work, but will also cause a lot of damage

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lunelovegood@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 week ago (26 children)

One parent said their daughter was “completely addicted” to social media

Literally the fault of the parent.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (12 children)

have a look at who proposed this change and you'll see why it's being done. it's clear as day that this isn't a win for anyone on the internet in Australia

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] RonniePickering@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ban it all, its a plague on civilization!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wondrous_strange@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Instead of punishing these cancerous cess pool manipulative platforms, they punish the kids.

The youth deserves to be able to communicate and use the web the same as the rest of the population.

Regulations should be such that these platforms are neutral, non manipulative safe spaces where people can come together share content and discussions.

The overall stupidity of decision makers is incomprehensible to me. Literal shit sacks politicians that should all be thrown into a hole.

Beat of luck youth, my heart is with you. Hope Lemmy will be the answer(or some other decentralized platform)

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Curious to see what it’s like in 40 years when the world is ruled by Australians.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Who's next to be blocked?

I mean, now that the infrastructure and policies are in place, it's only a matter of time.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Dalraz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What could possibly go wrong, is the phrase that comes to mind.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Kids will become tech savvy again.

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 11 points 1 week ago

I wonder if Roblox squeezed through the cracks.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

No offence, children, but this is great news.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 1 week ago

in 20 years Australia will be the source of all nobel prize winners :D

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

OMG! This is an outrage! What will the shareholders do!!!! Make less money?! Never!!

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Where are children supposed to meet and socialize? We already took away all their in-person spaces.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We already took away all their in-person spaces.

Arcades and malls have been dead for a long time. Capitalism took them away.

Everyone is missing incentive to go outside and hang out with real people, but that's only because we have an alternative that fills you up and requires less effort. Our "socializing" is junk food, it only harms you.

Maybe more young people will start doing what kids have been doing since the dawn of time, and making their own communities and their own places to hang out and play and do active things together, face-to-face.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Most malls ban unaccompanied minors. And most places where kids used to hang out similarly discourage their presence. The death of third places is a well-documented phenomenon, one that goes back decades before anyone dreamed of social media. And while kids have been forming their own communities since the dawn of time, kids haven't been raised in suburban hellscapes since the dawn of time. If you can't drive. If there's no way to your neighorhood except a giant highway that's impossible to bike on, how in the hell are kids supposed to meet up with each other in person? Digital technologies are really the only way kids have to socialize nowadays. We've taken everything else from them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›