this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

51321 readers
1566 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atk007@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When did IDF become a protected minority group? Is saying "Death to Nazis" not allowed in the UK?

[–] copd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'll get downvoted for this but what im about to say is an undeniable fact. Chanting death for anyone is inciting violence and murder, UK governments and police can't be allowing that, especially as there is no death penalty.

Yes I know, the IDF incite violence and murder, but does that make it OK to do in UK?

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Did they say "IDF" or "IDF members/staff"? IDF isn't a person, so maybe it's more of a metaphorical death, as in dismantle the IDF.

I dunno.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

led crowds in chants of “free, free Palestine” and “death, death to the IDF” [The BBC said:] “The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable ... " [Starmer said:] “appalling hate speech.”

"Free Palestine" is not antisemitic. Criticism of a nation state's armed forces is not antisemitic. Especially when those armed forces are objectively committing genocide.

[–] copd@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I'm sure "death to the IDF" is what some people have issues with rather than "free Palestine"

chanting death for any group idendity en mass will always be controversial, even if it's for Nazis

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, chanting death to Nazi was never controversial. It wouldn't even be controversial if it was death to the Russian army .

You are denying Palestinians right to self defense by opposing the chant death to the IDF

[–] copd@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You're bubbled, it's undeniably controversial to chant death to people, especially groups of people. By debating it you agree it's controversial, do you even know what the word means?

Please don't try to say I'm denying Palestinans the right to self defence because I don't want to chant death to their oppressors. My friend, that's a wild statement and you should pipe down

Next you're going to tell me I'm pro Russia because I don't agree Putin should be assassinated

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you think russian soldiers can't be killed in ukraine then yes you would be pro russia

[–] copd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I never said that, I don't think that. I have no idea why you came up with that.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I said if. So do support the occupied figjting the invaders or not?

[–] copd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

How did you go from talking about an English artist performing in England, chanting towards an English crowd about killing foreign army, to asking if I support defending your own nation aganst invaders

Do you think I'm supporting the horrors of the IDF because I refuse to stand up and chant death to the IDF?

I go to free palistine protests in my own country, I probably do more than most but I draw the line at calling for murder.

Extremeism is scary

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How stupid can you be. You want paleatinians do do nothing when the idf is comiting all the crimes? Death to idf can only happen in palestine where they have the right to kill invaders

[–] copd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

when did I say that? and now you're name calling?

You're not listening to anything I have to say and fabricating an argument which I'm not saying from absolutely nowhere

I don't know why I bother trying to talk to people like you. goodbye

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago

Never heard about something called deduction ?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I guarantee you can find droves of zionists that say "free Palestine" implies the destruction of Israel and is therefore antisemitic.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What a shitty article. It's so heavily biased in favor of genocide.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Happy cake day!

They didn't even do the most basic of work to attempt to put forward a front of journalistic integrity. They didn't give Vylan a chance to respond to the article.

[–] alcibiades@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What did you want them to say? It’s not an opinion piece.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

They should be more neutral in a non-opinion piece. They quote a lot more people saying pro-genocide things than they quote people saying anti-genocide things. They quoted pro-genocide politicians and pro-genocide BBC staff. They did not give the musicians any opportunity to respond to the article.

Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza has inflamed tensions around the world, triggering pro-Palestinian protests in many capitals and on college campuses. Israel and some supporters have described the protests as antisemitic, while critics say Israel uses such descriptions to silence opponents

Let's consider the two positions mentioned in this paragraph:

  1. Israel should stop committing genocide

  2. Israel should continue committing genocide, and position 1 is antisemitic

The first position is described as "pro-Palestinian", as if these protesters support the Palestinian military (Hamas) and want them to win. This is incorrect. These people mostly just want the genocide to end.

The second position is a shitty opinion, but also contains an overt falsehood. It's an objective fact that it's false, and that fact should be reported in the story, but it isn't.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To be honest I had never heard of Bob Vylan before, so the people screaming they should be banned (so they dont become known?) reached the opposite effect, at least for me personally.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I've been upping the listenership for kneecap and Bob vylan for about a month now. Saving for hard copies to help support. This all reminds me of the satanic panic that was so common when I was a kid. Such fuckery to suppress an idea.