this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
273 points (96.3% liked)

World News

51337 readers
2047 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Children as young as 11 who demonstrate misogynistic behaviour will be taught the difference between pornography and real relationships, as part of a multimillion-pound investment to tackle misogyny in England’s schools, the Guardian understands.

On the eve of the government publishing its long-awaited strategy to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, David Lammy told the Guardian that the battle “begins with how we raise our boys”, adding that toxic masculinity and keeping girls and women safe were “bound together”.

As part of the government’s flagship strategy, which was initially expected in the spring, teachers will be able to send young people at risk of causing harm on behavioural courses, and will be trained to intervene if they witness disturbing or worrying behaviour.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

You're trying to imply that I'm some sort 9f peado for noticing a weird trend of displaying young girls ...

We're not saying you're a paedophile. We are saying that 1. You nnoticed and referenced the girls first, and 2. Commented immediately on what they were wearing. That in and of itself identifies what is important to you .... which seems to be that you want girls/women to dress 'appropriately' vs them being able to dress as they choose.

(In this context I'm setting aside the fact the pic shows them all wearing black and white which denotes a school-type uniform/regulation).

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I noticed the girls and their clothing as a continuation of the trend. I trend which I have noticed over several years of such stories. Why does this trend exist? Can you explain?

And as I have said repeatedly, but I will stress once again, I am not commenting on peoples choice to wear whatever they want, regardless of age or gender. I am commenting on the choice, by the photographers to always photograph one gender, of a particular age, wearing particular clothes. Or perhaps the editors to always chose images which meet those criteria, as I'm sure the photographers take many many photos. Or are they simply stock images, and there is a limited pool to choose from? I don't know, I'm not a journalist. But nonetheless, this trend exists, and I think it's a bit weird.

Also you say I immediately commented.... Well, when should I have commented?

[–] Isolde@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This is what you’re saying to everyone else;

“Isn’t it weird how children wear clothes?”

No, it isn’t. There isn’t a trend for anyone apart from you, no one thinks that children in uniform is odd, no one feels like a creepy uncle looking at them. You’re asking others for an answer you can only give yourself. You should ask yourself why that bothers you and work through whatever is making you uncomfortable.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What I am saying is, "isn't it weird how, out of all the children wearing clothes, the newspapers decided to predominantly show one subset". Why is that? Can you explain?

[–] Isolde@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I should explain to you uniforms and why children are largely pictured wearing them? Goodbye.