this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
-47 points (34.0% liked)

Memes

53481 readers
1139 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (23 children)

I can't ban anyone, lol, and I'm absolutely correct here. The communists, as usual, are correct.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (22 children)

Then tell the admins to at least show their names when banning someone from their instance. Cowards

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (21 children)

Nah, you got banned for good reason, you're an incredibly racist, homophobic, far-right Euronationalist. Your attitude towards the global south is straight out of the colonial era.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You got me right on euronationalist, the rest of your comment shows how little you understood about me. But that's normal, you cannot fathom a left position which is not for a totalitarian regime based on an idea of communism which should have been terminated once the USSR fell ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I understand you perfectly well, you're an open book. You're an anti-communist, homophobic, racist Euronationalist, ie a fascist. It's pretty clear-cut. Nationalism in the global north perpetuates imperialism, fascism is anti-communist, you think people in the global south are ethnically inferior and you tell queer people that they need to not be offended by your homophobia. There's no possibility you could be anything other than far-right, be it socially or economically.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao, you are supporting the same side of people like Candace Owens, Benny Johnson and Tim Pool and you're calling me a fascist? Dude, there haven't been free elections in Russia for the last 30 years, how long will it take you to understand that the time of the proletariat are over and that Putin, Xi and Kim are three of the last fascistic tyrant left in the modern world? Do you think people from Belarus are free to express what they think about Lukashenko? What will you get if you organise a pro-lgbt rally in Moscow? How would you like trying opening an indipendent new site in China?

Get down your cloud man, you're not fighting for everyday people, you're fighting for dictators and tyrants but you're too stubborn to even think about it

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No, you're ridiculous. Putin is a nationalist, sure, but Russia isn't imperialist like the US and western Europe. Kim Jong-Un and Xi Jinping are socialists, not fascists like Macron, Trump, Starmer, Merz, etc. Lukashenko is popular in Belarus, and independent sites exist in China all the time.

You're an admitted Euronationalist, a supporter of imperialism and a demonizer of socialism and socialists, a racist, a homophobe, all around far-right. I'm a communist, and support socialist countries and oppose imperialism. The government in China in particular is extremely popular, with over 90% approval rates even when taken by western orgs, and a more genuinely democratic government than any western country:

I'm indeed "stubborn" in that I'm consistent in supporting the working classes and opposing imperialism.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah sure, go aay that Russia is not imperialist to a Georgian or to an Abkhazian. You could also try with anyone from the Baltic region or from Afghanistan, if you prefer.

May I remind you that even Nazis had the word "socialist" in their party name and that taking votes without assurance of anonymity is not a good way to test what people really feel about their government? Is there any other party outside the Chinese populist party who can use the same mainstream media reserved to the party? Does china allow third indipendent nations to scrutinize their election process? Do you understand that prominent right wing figures in America (mostly fascists) are currently hoping that Russia will win against Ukraine? How can you square allm this up and still believe what you believe? You might be really high on your clouds of lies, look out because the higher you are, the hardest the fall

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Russia isn't imperialist, it doesn't have a stake in the global financial monopoly that it uses to plunder the world. The west does though, Italy included.

China isn't socialist because their party is called the Communist Party of China, but because public ownership is the principle aspect of the economy and the working classes are in control of the state. They do let people report on their systems, what they don't do is allow imperialist countries like the US and European countries to interfere or attempt regime change.

The far-right generally doesn't care about Ukraine or Russia, what they want is for imperialist countries to stop giving aid to Ukraine. The far-right also has anti-semites that oppose Israel not because Israel is fascist and committing genocide, but because it's Jewish. You do realize that your far-right views are aligned on your view of socialist countries and support for western imperialism?

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So Russia doesn't sell its oil and it's resources to the international market used by the same enterprises which are destroying the world through capitalism? Good to know!!!

And china is not trying to produce a regime change in Hong Kong, Taiwan and the Philippines for its own good? Then I must immediately inform these countries not to worry about their neighbour!!!

Call me when you wake up from your dreams my boy...

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Russia does sell oil, I don't see what that has to do with anything right now. As for China, there's no "regime change" in Hong Kong, they just got Hong Kong back from Britain. Taiwan is governed by the Kuomintang that invaded Taiwan and slaughtered the indigenous people there when the KMT lost the Civil War, and is gradually more in favor of reunification. The Phillipines aren't being attacked by China. Again, you're taking the far-right, pro-colonial stance, and just wish China was still under British and later Japanese colonialism.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And to whom does Russia sell its oil to? To "socialist" countries alone or does it partake in the same market where "capitalist" countries buy their oil?

The "incidents" between military Chinese vessles and commercial fishing boats from the Philippines are all random and have nothing to do with china claims on territorial waters around that area?

People from Hong Kong who didn't want to be living as the rest of China are free to express their views or should they be jailed for having such kind of thoughts?

Are the people from Taiwan free to choose their own future or are they forced to be reunited with mainland China?

Lastly, do you think everyone can have his own will and desires and be free to express them or do you support the censorship of views which do not align with your political belief?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Russia selling oil to capitalist countries is an entirely normal thing for countries to do. Not only can socialist countries trade with capitalist ones, Russia isn't socialist to begin with, so I'm not sure what this point is.

China and the Phillipines have different claims to land and sea, and that does cause conflict, sure. China isn't trying to dominate the Phillipines or extract them for wealth.

People in Hong Kong that prefered to remain a British colony were largely the wealthy capitalists that benefited most from the system. Overall, most people are happier being reunited.

China's stance is that it's fine to wait for the people of Taiwan to choose reunification on their own. NATO countries are heavilu arming Taiwan to provoke a messy and violent reunification.

I don't think the speech of fascists needs to be protected, nor the speech of capotalists. Free expression is only genuinely possible in classless society to begin with.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, the massive protests seen in 2019 were all brought by the capitalists™️, no worker did partake with the millions people marching in the streets.

Do you realise how unserious you sound???

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The 2019 protests were western backed. Jimmy Lai was just proven to have colluded with western governments. No, I never claimed there were no workers among those that rioted, my claim was that the working class in general was not behind the protests, and that instead it was a western-backed capitalist-led protest, which is true.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So, in your view, a single man can sway an entire people to follow his ideals without any issue? My my, he must be a master of deception, maybe Loki himself. You're as unserious as the legal processes in dictatorships

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No? Jimmy Lai was just one example that was convicted in the last few days after evidence was collected. You're deeply unserious.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And where are the rest of the people who helped this wrong insurrection against the Chinese government?? Millions of people rallying against China but they're still the good guys. Keep telling yourself that you're right and everybody else is wrong, you'll be always right

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The riots died down and the majority of people support the status quo. That's literally what happened. Hong Kong is doing better now than when they were a British colony, that you seem to wish they remain.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world 0 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

Why did the riots died down? Was it a decision by the people or had the Chinese state step in to crack down the manifestations by force? Have you seen the images of Chinese police attacking protestors and people?? Are you selectively blind?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

It was both. Police cracked down on violent protestors, and the protestors gave up as well. The pro-colonization side lost and now most people support the status quo. Capitaliats are still upset though.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world 0 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the always useful "violent protestors". How convenient there's always some in all movements against China

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

The west does indeed try to force violence into protests they back, yep! Arming and radicalizing people against socialist governments is a tried and true tactic of the west.

[–] FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

And please tell me, how can you radicalise an entire people to the point where they are ready to put their lives on the line for the ideals you presented them with? Couldn't it be that these people share those same ideals while rejecting the ones being forcefully placed on themselves by what they see as a dictatorship? No, of course not, they are just all stupid and brainwashed I'm sure will be your answer. More projecting from someone who, as I already said, should have worked in a cinema

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)