this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

51321 readers
1341 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Swiss voters on Sunday decisively rejected a call to require women to do national service in the military, civil protection teams or other forms, as all men must do already.

Official results. with counting still ongoing in some areas after a referendum, showed that more than half of Switzerland’s cantons, or states, had rejected the “citizen service initiative” by wide margins. That meant it was defeated, because proposals need a majority of both voters and cantons to pass.

Voters also heavily rejected a separate proposal to impose a new national tax on individual donations or inheritances of more than 50 million francs ($62 million), with the revenues to be used to fight the impact of climate change and help Switzerland meet its ambitions to have net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Insane that any democracy would reject an inheritance tax

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because it is theft. If my parents are successful and pay their taxes why is it fair to double tax a child’s inheritance. You tax earnings and income. You don’t the same money multiple times.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's more important to prevent an aristocracy than it is to be fair.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Those things aren’t mutually exclusive. You can be fair as well as tax the rich.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Over 60 Million dollars is a lot of money. More money than your kid needs to live comfortably and never have to work ever again. That's so much money you are creating a family that never has to experience the life of a normal person and can use that money to influence politics to compound that effect.

How much money does a person need to live comfortably without having to contribute labor? 2-5 million? Is living in luxury but not so much that someone who's never had a real job can just buy elections unfair?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You are presenting issues that are irrelevant to the tax. Yes those things you mentioned are unfair and should be regulated accordingly. Those are irrelevant to an inheritance tax. If you want to create a wealth tax over a certain amount that’s fine but call a spade a spade. Don’t hide it as inheritance tax and allow wealthy people to hide their money in other ways like trusts and businesses.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thing is the same money does regularly get taxed multiple times. You get shafted on money as it comes to you (income tax) and u get shafted on that money once you spend it to (sales tax). Hell I bought a house and will get to pay taxes on that annually for as long as I own it, despite already paying my state and fed govt taxes.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Just because everyone is getting fucked doesn’t mean it’s right. Double taxing only hurts the poor because they can’t hide money in tax free investments or businesses that they use to write off expenses.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not that insane. Most people only concern themselves with their own issues. And if you're a 40 year old whose childhood home is now worth 500k or whatever and you have to pay 200k in taxes in order to inherit it, then you probably want to vote against it because otherwise the government will take it.

Okay, take all that with a grain of salt because I'm not too familiar with inheritance law, but it's based on multiple similar stories I've heard from people.

I still think it should be taxed, don't get me wrong. But I understand why people are against it.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The text indicates that it's only on inheritances greater than 62 million dollars

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, it's true that in this case most people would never have to care about that. When I replied I was thinking about inheritance taxes in general. My bad.