this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

40553 readers
63 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CameronDev@programming.dev -1 points 2 days ago (15 children)

360TB x 500Mb/s write == 73 days to write

https://www.omnicalculator.com/other/data-transfer

Thats a long write time. Also, I have to assume that most of the read/write hardware can't live that long, so that's all a bit theoretical. They'll stop producing the hardware shortly after selling all the discs.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I mean, you can always make new hardware. The idea of media that basically lasts forever is really useful in my opinion. We currently don't have anything that would last as long as regular paper. Most of the information we have is stored on volatile media. Using something like this to permanently record accumulated knowledge like scientific papers, technology blueprints, and so on, would be a very good idea in my opinion.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You could make new hardware, but realistically, it doesnt happen. The secrets get lost, the skills get lost, and the medium dies.

There is no chance that there is a working reader in a few thousand years time, let alone billions.

All that said, I agree that we need stable long term storage, my point is that billion year storage is just a fantasy spec. It looks good to investors, but doesnt hold up to reality.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I don't think billions of years is really a meaningful metric here. It's more that it's a stable medium where we could record things that will persist for an indefinite amount of time without degradation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)