this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
595 points (97.4% liked)

Lefty Memes

6334 readers
1121 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (19 children)

all IRL anarchists i ever met are based. can't think of a single exception rn.

internet western "anarchists" are insufferable, because they are very obviously just libs trying to look cool.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

This might not be what you meant, but I've found 90+% of the 'online left' regardless of ideology to be far more ultra-left, alienated and toxic than most people on the ground, even including the drama kiddos on college campuses and split rival organizations. To everyone I highly recommend finding people in real life, if possible.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

real life leftists are fun as hell to be around. if anyone's looking for some:

  • IWW
  • CWA
  • Redneck Revolt
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I kinda got excited about redneck revolt but their website says they disbanded in 2019.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago

the national org did but the local groups are still active. probably look for things that say either "redneck revolt" or "john brown society"

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 6 days ago

Good.

Harder to usurp and pervert.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

there are niches with good people but i get where you are coming from.

i think most leftists are yet to learn how to use the internet effectively. that and they get heavily censored in corporate social media.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 4 points 6 days ago

Or left it entirely over a decade ago.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Probably a lot of fake anarchists paid (or duped) to give anarchism a bad name, to give people the wrong idea about what anarchism is, to turn them away from mutual freedom for each and all, back into the arms of daddy corporatarchy government.

Like that malarch in this thread, saying they wanted to kill 37% of everybody, because anarchism. `_`

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

the cia has done shit like this in the past and i bet they will do it again here, but i doubt lemmy is already being intervened on just yet.

i think we are still on the passionate lib stage of things.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 6 days ago

Arguably the dupes.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As opposed to internet communists who are well known for not being insufferable

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

leftists in general are correct (anarchists and communists alike), a lot of libs are bothered by that.

i think this is the main reason, regardless of how annoying the specific terminally online individual might be.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 days ago

there's also difference between being correct and being effective. right wing propaganda machines program people to exist in binaries and young leftists, new initiates i mean, have to break out of that. they have to learn to listen to the problems people are experiencing and talk about how to address those problems rather than fixating on an us/them dichotomy

[–] NetSett@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What exactly does based mean in this context?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

it's ancient internet slang for something cool i guess.

[–] Matombo@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Matombo@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

maaaaan can't make it right ...

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that's default capitalism.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Let me be that exception! I think the best way to destroy authoritanism, is to help people become so independent of other's resources, that they can just decide to opt out of work for good. And there would be no way to strike against them that isn't blatant force or robbery (Can't cut their electricity due to bills, can't cut their food source as they grow their own, passive water generation, technical expertise, no illegal activities, small amount of passive income to cover land tax).

They would still have small vulnerabilities, but it would be quite quite hard to force them and keep them in a toxic workplace, if they can just chill for months or even YEARS, without being forced to work. This will force workplaces to basically suck up to the average employee, increase raises, increase benefits, and oh...abuse would be completely intollerable.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think the best way to destroy authoritanism, is to help people become so independent of other’s resources, that they can just decide to opt out of work for good.

Would you posit that one can prosper once they have become self-reliant by achieving political, economic, and military independence?

They would still have small vulnerabilities, but it would be quite quite hard to force them and keep them in a toxic workplace, if they can just chill for months or even YEARS, without being forced to work.

I mean, in theory, sure. But in practice, you'd need a large labor surplus that was unassailable by settler-colonialist looters. How do you marshal these reserves and defend them adequately?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah, the number one issue is military capabilities, and what I fear, since I can't and won't teach them violence. I just hope there will be enough backlash if they are disturbed.

The point isn't just to be a tough, individualist badass. The idea is that you can only have fair relationships, if there is nothing for others to leverage over you. The moment there's power dynamics, you introduce corruption. But if someone has to respect you, they can choose to leave the relationship, or compromise with you.

Then you can trade all the surplus, make all the relationships your heart desires, from a clean slate. What they have to figure out, is how to organize and fight themselves if needed.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

blatant force or robbery

my biggest worry is they do this a lot though and are escalating. fighting back won't be easy considering they are beefing up police and military forces around the world.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Everyone has limited resources, especially when your source is cut off.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah. Bring on the emancipatory technologies.

All the technologies that can emancipate us, each and all.

Y'know...

All those technologies that are suppressed by capitalists to maintain their crippling extortionate rents that happen to be very polluting too.

And to, oh, y'know, undo all the McCarthyian redscare psyop that conflates anarcho-communism with totalitarian communism and presents capitalism as the system that frees them.

"Ferengi don't want to end the exploitation. They want to become the exploiters." -- Rom

Would be a lot easier once people stop falling for all the "advertising and marketing".

Or if someone just decides to provision everybody with spaceships of their own. Each capable of printing another of itself instantly, sustain life, with zero-point energy powered zero-inertia propulsion, safe enough for a 2 year old to fly home. I hear these already exist (for about a century now). Could have not just "disclosure", but radical provisioning sublimation. Do you have spaceships yet? And the reassurance everybody else does too so they're not trying to take yours?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I fucking would if I could. You have no idea the insane shit I tried to do that no normal person would!

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

Something like that. Attempted to fucking carve a 3D printer frame out of some rotten log (I was destitute, and trying to recreate the WolfStrap).

I had no plan on how to get the metal parts.

I also (attempted) to design something that can print itself.

Now I'm trapped in an eternal cycle of work, like most people, and my next shot (if any), will be during retirement.

load more comments (13 replies)