this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
39 points (88.2% liked)

Memes

53473 readers
721 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (41 children)

Sources:

  • china news propaganda site
  • medium article from rando
  • project syndicate link which is an op-ed site (not news)
  • a wiki page from an incredibly biased group
  • a youtube link...
  • a site calling itself a news site, yet no actual credentials, but seems to be associated with China (Ajit Singh has written Chinese propaganda books)
  • a substack link

This has to be the least compelling list of evidence one could provide, and yet you get upvotes because it looks like you've provided proof of something. All you've done is provide a lot of incredibly, seriously biased opinions with no actual facts at all.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Would you prefer something from America's own fox news or New York Times?

[–] tyler@programming.dev -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No, neither. You’re making up a position and pretending like I believe that to make my argument look weak. I’m not the one posting shit sources.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

What is an example of an axtually credible spurce in your opinion?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)