Photography

6738 readers
1 users here now

c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.

Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.

THE RULES

  1. Be nice to each other

This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.

  1. Keep content on topic

All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...

  1. No politics or religion

This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.

  1. No classified ads or job offers

All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.

  1. No spam or self-promotion

One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.

  1. If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.

  2. Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)

  3. Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)

The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

Hello there

I just developed two black and white film rolls. That was a painful experience, because of my bad choice of film:

👿 The Lucky SHD400 is too thin, curling on itself like crazy, slipping on the reel.

🫤 The Lomography earl grey 100 is a bit thicker, better catch on reel’s sides and locking ball.

I wish next rolls will be easier to feed on the reel, any advices ?

Until now nothing beats the Kikipan 320. But it’s not produced anymore.

Asking AI seems only to praise most expensive films, not sure if it is true or biased.

Also I tired asking on the mastodon and associated platform first with not much luck.

Hopefully lemmy is better suited for that kind of open question ?

2
3
4
61
[OC] Deep Dark (testing.crazypeople.online)
submitted 1 week ago by teagrrl@lemmy.ml to c/photography@lemmy.ml
5
6
34
[OC] Jellyfish (testing.crazypeople.online)
submitted 2 weeks ago by teagrrl@lemmy.ml to c/photography@lemmy.ml
7
2
[OC] Waiting For Your Arrival (testing.crazypeople.online)
submitted 3 weeks ago by teagrrl@lemmy.ml to c/photography@lemmy.ml
8
2
[OC] Summer Greens & Oranges (testing.crazypeople.online)
submitted 4 weeks ago by teagrrl@lemmy.ml to c/photography@lemmy.ml
9
10
11
1
insomnia posting (testing.crazypeople.online)
12
 
 
13
2
Hello There (testing.crazypeople.online)
14
1
[OC] Winter's Whisper (testing.crazypeople.online)
submitted 1 month ago by teagrrl@lemmy.ml to c/photography@lemmy.ml
 
 

We got some snow over the weekend, autumn is quickly coming to a close and I can hear winter's whisper. 🥶

15
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52799341

Hello there

I just received a TTArtisant 40mm macro for my Fuji XM-1, much needed to scan negatives.

The focus ring is slow and need quite some efforts to turn. Probably best for precision and not sliding out of focus.

But the mount has a quite a lot of play. It rotates following the focus ring adjustments, which, in turn, mess with the focus… It fit nicely flat on the body but this angular free play is annoying.

Anyway I need a macro lens, and can’t afford $600 for a genuine Fujinon X mount Lens…

Does anyone also have TTArtisan manual focus lenses ? How does they fit ?

I am tempted to send it back, can’t decide. Any advices ?

Bye

[Edit] new lens came in, with exact same angular play. I guess it's my life now, I shall keep it.

16
2
Halfway through autumn (testing.crazypeople.online)
17
 
 

Pwetty colours.

18
 
 

19
1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by arsCynic@lemmy.ml to c/photography@lemmy.ml
 
 

🦕 found The Loch Ness Monster's fossil.

20
21
2
[OC] Blooms (testing.crazypeople.online)
submitted 1 month ago by teagrrl@lemmy.ml to c/photography@lemmy.ml
22
23
24
 
 
25
 
 

Hello all

I was hoping to get some advice on editing these two photos I took with my OM-1 in hi-res mode. I have pretty limited experience editing in darktable (or editing digital files, at all. in fact, I pretty much suck lol) , and find myself getting burnt out during editing sessions where ill think my image looks good, ill step away, come back and think its not great.

In this case, I'm having trouble getting my edited raw images to look as good (here, in this case, I'm mostly talking sharpness) as the OOC jpeg. I guess Olympus does quite a bit of sharpening? I'm a bit more confident in my colorgrading/saturation/exposure adjustments but for these particular images I feel like I could work on them forever and never be satisfied.

Was wondering if I could get some advice on these images. I've included the raw files, the OOC jpegs, and my lightly edited images in this album. I was hoping to see if anyone would be willing to do a quick edit themselves to see if they are able to make a good image out of these rawfiles, but that's quite a bit of work, so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Edit: whoops, i lied. the landscape shot PA172635 is not hi-res, its regular 20MP. I've added two more OOC jpegs and their rawfiles (both hi res) that I selected and thought looked best out of all the photos i took today.

view more: next ›